EDFL Div 1 2020

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reader mode
BoozeBud said:
I think the way it works is if a club knocks back a player 3 times then it goes to the board for reviewing. Obviously KP wont win considering there is a fixed rule you can only take 2 players per club and if they slack on the rule then any team can get away with it.

Only way EK would release x amount of players i assume will be with a $$ agreement between the two clubs id say. But yeah not 100% what happens in that case
Click to expand...

Players should just put in a clearance to another club first

Then to KP to get around it
 

Log in to remove this ad.

BoozeBud said:
I think the way it works is if a club knocks back a player 3 times then it goes to the board for reviewing. Obviously KP wont win considering there is a fixed rule you can only take 2 players per club and if they slack on the rule then any team can get away with it.

Only way EK would release x amount of players i assume will be with a $$ agreement between the two clubs id say. But yeah not 100% what happens in that case
Click to expand...
The rule is a local rule specific to the EDFL - and for the integrity & consistency should be more detailed to specify players transferring from other comps which is why EK is in this position with players wanting to leave - Nothing stopping the whole seconds/ Thirds side going to Deer park or Sunshine which is probably 5-10 drive down the road and a different comp. I understand the intention of this rule - but it needs to be tightened up to alleviate 35+ players coming in to one club over a 2 year period. Under rule 4.a.3 players can present their case to the board for a $550 fee with a refund of $275. This money will go to the EDFL - $ 1925.00 based on the players denied - when the case is won and the players released , only the biggest EGO's will win in the end and at the end of the day, it will be the players decision what they want to do NOT the clubs. But, based on the rumours, it will be a miraculous turnaround if they wear the EK jumper come round 1 2020- Solution - KP just pay EK $1000 Bucks and move on and save a lot of time
 
Pro2 said:
Give Tullamarine and Deer Park a call he met with both 3 weeks ago
Click to expand...

And the Tullamarine meeting was set up by
Biggest Choker said:
The rule is a local rule specific to the EDFL - and for the integrity & consistency should be more detailed to specify players transferring from other comps which is why EK is in this position with players wanting to leave - Nothing stopping the whole seconds/ Thirds side going to Deer park or Sunshine which is probably 5-10 drive down the road and a different comp. I understand the intention of this rule - but it needs to be tightened up to alleviate 35+ players coming in to one club over a 2 year period. Under rule 4.a.3 players can present their case to the board for a $550 fee with a refund of $275. This money will go to the EDFL - $ 1925.00 based on the players denied - when the case is won and the players released , only the biggest EGO's will win in the end and at the end of the day, it will be the players decision what they want to do NOT the clubs. But, based on the rumours, it will be a miraculous turnaround if they wear the EK jumper come round 1 2020- Solution - KP just pay EK $1000 Bucks and move on and save a lot of time
Click to expand...

Also hearing Cooper Perry will be another to depart EK. Off to Tullamarine to play with mates Gatt and Dalrymple
 
Biggest Choker said:
The rule is a local rule specific to the EDFL - and for the integrity & consistency should be more detailed to specify players transferring from other comps which is why EK is in this position with players wanting to leave - Nothing stopping the whole seconds/ Thirds side going to Deer park or Sunshine which is probably 5-10 drive down the road and a different comp. I understand the intention of this rule - but it needs to be tightened up to alleviate 35+ players coming in to one club over a 2 year period. Under rule 4.a.3 players can present their case to the board for a $550 fee with a refund of $275. This money will go to the EDFL - $ 1925.00 based on the players denied - when the case is won and the players released , only the biggest EGO's will win in the end and at the end of the day, it will be the players decision what they want to do NOT the clubs. But, based on the rumours, it will be a miraculous turnaround if they wear the EK jumper come round 1 2020- Solution - KP just pay EK $1000 Bucks and move on and save a lot of time
Click to expand...
This is a state wide rule. But most comps it’s 3-4 players.
EDFL have there’s set at 2 i’m guessing.
 
Biggest Choker said:
The rule is a local rule specific to the EDFL - and for the integrity & consistency should be more detailed to specify players transferring from other comps which is why EK is in this position with players wanting to leave - Nothing stopping the whole seconds/ Thirds side going to Deer park or Sunshine which is probably 5-10 drive down the road and a different comp. I understand the intention of this rule - but it needs to be tightened up to alleviate 35+ players coming in to one club over a 2 year period. Under rule 4.a.3 players can present their case to the board for a $550 fee with a refund of $275. This money will go to the EDFL - $ 1925.00 based on the players denied - when the case is won and the players released , only the biggest EGO's will win in the end and at the end of the day, it will be the players decision what they want to do NOT the clubs. But, based on the rumours, it will be a miraculous turnaround if they wear the EK jumper come round 1 2020- Solution - KP just pay EK $1000 Bucks and move on and save a lot of time
Click to expand...
Yeah like i said Kp will be better off settling this with EK behind closed doors for like $250 a player for example.
 
Biggest Choker said:
The rule is a local rule specific to the EDFL - and for the integrity & consistency should be more detailed to specify players transferring from other comps which is why EK is in this position with players wanting to leave - Nothing stopping the whole seconds/ Thirds side going to Deer park or Sunshine which is probably 5-10 drive down the road and a different comp. I understand the intention of this rule - but it needs to be tightened up to alleviate 35+ players coming in to one club over a 2 year period. Under rule 4.a.3 players can present their case to the board for a $550 fee with a refund of $275. This money will go to the EDFL - $ 1925.00 based on the players denied - when the case is won and the players released , only the biggest EGO's will win in the end and at the end of the day, it will be the players decision what they want to do NOT the clubs. But, based on the rumours, it will be a miraculous turnaround if they wear the EK jumper come round 1 2020- Solution - KP just pay EK $1000 Bucks and move on and save a lot of time
Click to expand...

I still don’t get why people are talking about reserves/thirds players when there is a lot going on around the league
 
Oldtimesceptic said:
I think the EDFL will overrule and they will all end up at KP
Click to expand...
If they do that though it sets a standard for other teams to do it... sets a precedent they have to follow. May as well throw the rule in the bin. 0 chance league will bend on the rule.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

BoozeBud said:
If they do that though it sets a standard for other teams to do it... sets a precedent they have to follow. May as well throw the rule in the bin. 0 chance league will bend on the rule.
Click to expand...
Difference is they will try help KP get a reserves team. Which I hope they do get one for 2020.
I hope the league do allow it but unfortunately it’s not the league the you go to on appeal it’s Afl Vic is my understanding.
They will decide after 3 denials
 
the horse whisper said:
Difference is they will try help KP get a reserves team. Which I hope they do get one for 2020.
I hope the league do allow it but unfortunately it’s not the league the you go to on appeal it’s Afl Vic is my understanding.
They will decide after 3 denials
Click to expand...

The 2 player rule between EDFL clubs is an EDFL rule, not a AFl vic rule.
There is no appeal process in place for this rule , it would be up to EDFL. So good luck knowing what the outcome could be lol
 
Reader mode
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

G
  • Sticky
EDFL Div 1 Discussion 2024
20 21 22 23 24
Replies
575
Views
75K
inanunda
inanunda
L
  • Sticky
EDFL Div 2 discussion 2024
9 10 11 12 13
Replies
306
Views
48K
Turbos mail
T
N
Former EDFL Clubs
Replies
3
Views
591
NFNLWikiFan
N
L
  • Sticky
EDFL Premier Discussion 2024
41 42 43 44 45
Replies
1K
Views
118K
Sth Melb Hellas
S
1
EDFL Div 1 Discussion 2023
137 138 139 140 141
Replies
4K
Views
386K
HTPunter
H
P
EDFL Div 2 discussion 2023
21 22 23 24 25
Replies
619
Views
139K
Vlodrive
V
Aucklander
  • Sticky
EDFL move to PlayHQ
Replies
4
Views
9K
Aucklander
Aucklander

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top