eDPS
Brownlow Medallist
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2010
- Posts
- 26,076
- Reaction score
- 44,232
- Location
- Melbourne - Eastern Suburbs
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

I’ve only had McDonald move up since they started againIs this why you have a heap of WA players moving up your boards? More exposure to those players, hence they look like shiny new toys?
Edwards could add depth do a lot of areas, Trew is more of a pure mid where as Edwards can play forward and back aswell. I don’t think Edwards is on Trews level as a mid but he is still different enough to allow getting both.I am very happy with the selection of Trew for Adelaide. He is the exact type of player that we currently have the greatest need for. My only concern is whether Edwards will address this need for us as a big bodied, clearance specialist. Edwards will come bit cheaper but will obviously not be as high quality. I wouldn't want to run the risk of having to many slow inside specialists in the one midfield. Do you think that the two are too similar? and how would you compare them as midfielders? Typically clubs pick the best available talent early and address list balance with later picks but in this case we are (probably) already locked in to Edwards with a later pick so I wonder if we would look at a more balanced midfielder like O'Driscoll on Bruhn at that pick if they are available. Do you think that access to F/S or NGA players later in a draft - or a high quality one the next year - effects what a club does with earlier picks or do they still pick the best available?
Thanks for the response. We'll take both in that case.Edwards could add depth do a lot of areas, Trew is more of a pure mid where as Edwards can play forward and back aswell. I don’t think Edwards is only Trews level as a mid but he is still different enough to allow getting both.
Who knows how long the NGA lasts so clubs may not give at as much thought from now on but you would certainly need to consider it for talented f/s. For example Essendon has two gun small forwards to come in for 2022 in the Davey Twins, pies have a small forward in Dib next year and a midfielder in Daicos so they may not look at those types this year.
Where did McDonald start the season at? He is obviously out-performing your expectations of him so far. If everyone keeps going the way they are does he end up at number one in your rankings? If he reverts back to your preseason expectations does he fall back down your rankings or is he now a top pick because he has shown that his best is very good? I'm interested in what a player needs to do to move and fall in your rankings. I know it would depend on the particular player but if you could explain in general the importance of a good game or a good month that would be an interesting read. Also what were your expectations for a KPF playing in the SANFL or WAFL? Is Thilthorpe over or under performing so far?I’ve only had McDonald move up since they started again
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I had him in the teens so it wasn’t going to take much for me to put him higher, I wasn’t sure on his contested marking but he has absolutely shown it. He will never improve his speed but apart from that he doesn’t really have many issues I can see. He could go 1 but it would be hard for crows to pass on a gun local talent in Thilthorpe.Where did McDonald start the season at? He is obviously out-performing your expectations of him so far. If everyone keeps going the way they are does he end up at number one in your rankings? If he reverts back to your preseason expectations does he fall back down your rankings or is he now a top pick because he has shown that his best is very good? I'm interested in what a player needs to do to move and fall in your rankings. I know it would depend on the particular player but if you could explain in general the importance of a good game or a good month that would be an interesting read. Also what were your expectations for a KPF playing in the SANFL or WAFL? Is Thilthorpe over or under performing so far?
So you’re saying Essendon won’t bid on Coleman jr. this draft.Edwards could add depth do a lot of areas, Trew is more of a pure mid where as Edwards can play forward and back aswell. I don’t think Edwards is on Trews level as a mid but he is still different enough to allow getting both.
Who knows how long the NGA lasts so clubs may not give at as much thought from now on but you would certainly need to consider it for talented f/s. For example Essendon has two gun small forwards to come in for 2022 in the Davey Twins, pies have a small forward in Dib next year and a midfielder in Daicos so they may not look at those types this year.
I didn’t think they would bid on the older one last year and didn’t think they would draft Johnson in the main draft. Dodoro works in mysterious ways sometimesSo you’re saying Essendon won’t bid on Coleman jr. this draft.
I suppose it is hard to say if a player does X then they will be pick Y because every player is different. I imagine Gould could have done just about anything last year and he never would have gone really high as he had physical traits holding him back. Other players probably only need to show a glimpse to be rated higher.I had him in the teens so it wasn’t going to take much for me to put him higher, I wasn’t sure on his contested marking but he has absolutely shown it. He will never improve his speed but apart from that he doesn’t really have many issues I can see. He could go 1 but it would be hard for crows to pass on a gun local talent in Thilthorpe.
Yeah you need more than one good game but the reason the likes of McDonald and Thilthorpe are rated as they are now is because they have had numerous good games for a few years now.
Thilthorpe is the most polarising player for me, his speed and leap worry me a bit mostly the leap though and that he is already a big unit compared to someone like JUH and McDonald who have a lot more size to put on yet in comparison. Thilthorpe however can do things not many other 200cm players can, he competes really well at ground level and commands a good defender on him because of his smarts and reach.
Drafting Johnson was a big two fingers up at the Lions and AFL.I didn’t think they would bid on the older one last year and didn’t think they would draft Johnson in the main draft. Dodoro works in mysterious ways sometimes
Gould’s testing at the combine was a real turn off, I think leap was the only thing decent when everything else was very poor especially endurance, it was a risk for clubs to take him high with his lack of athleticism but could still end up a bargain if he can really work on that athleticism. Scope and upside are big things scouts look for as kids dominating now and a sure thing to dominate at the next level and it’s usually the ones who are more physically developed that can struggle to live up to the hype.I suppose it is hard to say if a player does X then they will be pick Y because every player is different. I imagine Gould could have done just about anything last year and he never would have gone really high as he had physical traits holding him back. Other players probably only need to show a glimpse to be rated higher.
I don't watch any of the draft hopefuls so my opinion isn't worth much but Thilthorpe does concern me too. Everyone's opinion seems to be somewhat influenced by the fact that he is 200cm and like you said, is very mobile and fast for a player of that size. Unless he is going to play as a ruckman at AFL level - I understand that is highly unlikely - I see very little benefit in being 200cm rather than 195cm but that seems to come in to most peoples thinking. If he was 195cm would he be rated as highly as he is?
Additionally, has Thilthorpe every been a dominate forward? I thought that most of his junior career has been spent as a ruckman. It reminds me of Durdin who played his best junior footy as a ruckman but was drafted as a KPD. Durdin could also do things that few other his height could do.
Yeah saw that before good to see another likely prospect get a league game, would be good to see how he goes up the ground as he looked a natural forward from what I’ve seen up till now.Draft prospect Lachlan Grubb making his SANFL League debut on the wing for Central Districts.
Interesting player named in the Reserves for Glenelg.....Mitch Martin. must have done his quarantine..Yeah saw that before good to see another likely prospect get a league game, would be good to see how he goes up the ground as he looked a natural forward from what I’ve seen up till now.

I suppose it is hard to say if a player does X then they will be pick Y because every player is different. I imagine Gould could have done just about anything last year and he never would have gone really high as he had physical traits holding him back. Other players probably only need to show a glimpse to be rated higher.
I don't watch any of the draft hopefuls so my opinion isn't worth much but Thilthorpe does concern me too. Everyone's opinion seems to be somewhat influenced by the fact that he is 200cm and like you said, is very mobile and fast for a player of that size. Unless he is going to play as a ruckman at AFL level - I understand that is highly unlikely - I see very little benefit in being 200cm rather than 195cm but that seems to come in to most peoples thinking. If he was 195cm would he be rated as highly as he is?
Additionally, has Thilthorpe every been a dominate forward? I thought that most of his junior career has been spent as a ruckman. It reminds me of Durdin who played his best junior footy as a ruckman but was drafted as a KPD. Durdin could also do things that few other his height could do.
Just on DGB I think he could be developed in other areas of the ground, tall midfielders isn’t out of the question as he has some Bontempelli traits with his ground ball work.Thilthorpe has had good games as a forward. There is a touch of opportunism in some of his gameplay and he has never had a 9 goals match like say Max King, but then Thilthorpe has been playing at senior SANFL level, not Vic School football, which represents different opportunities and challenges.
Positional flexibility with talls seems to be seen as a significant factor by recruiters, and the emphasis on this will get bigger still with the suggested smaller lists. Given Thilthorpe clearly has more positional flexibility than say McDonald or Grainger-Barras, I think this is a big thing going for him. I think the 200cm thing is also worth noting - there are more and more KPs who are closer to 200cm than they are to 195cm; given playing as a tall is a lot about the cms (both in terms of height and jump), this size difference from the others is another advantage he has over the others.
I do have some concern about Thilthorpe’s and McDonald’s (and Callow‘lack of genuine ability to jump, or fly for a mark.Thilthorpe has had good games as a forward. There is a touch of opportunism in some of his gameplay and he has never had a 9 goals match like say Max King, but then Thilthorpe has been playing at senior SANFL level, not Vic School football, which represents different opportunities and challenges.
Positional flexibility with talls seems to be seen as a significant factor by recruiters, and the emphasis on this will get bigger still with the suggested smaller lists. Given Thilthorpe clearly has more positional flexibility than say McDonald or Grainger-Barras, I think this is a big thing going for him. I think the 200cm thing is also worth noting - there are more and more KPs who are closer to 200cm than they are to 195cm; given playing as a tall is a lot about the cms (both in terms of height and jump), this size difference from the others is another advantage he has over the others.
You didn’t see McDonald’s pack mark jumping from behind in the 2nd quarter? McDonald doesn’t have outstanding hops but it’s above average and way better than Callows. McDonald’s running vertical is 83cm which is 20cm better than Callows at 63cm. That would be alarm bells for me, if you were thinking of taking callow high in the draft as your future key forward.I do have some concern about Thilthorpe’s and McDonald’s (and Callow‘lack of genuine ability to jump, or fly for a mark.
I believe this will negatively impact their ability to take contested marks at AFL level.
I’ll admit I wasn’t that impressed with the McDonald highlights from last weekend. It was more that I thought the defending against him was poor, and that he wasn’t out bodying or out working a talented defender.
To be a top tier talk forward, I believe you need be able take marks on the lead, and be able to take either contested pack marks that do rely on your ability to either jump vertically or fly in from the side higher than the pack.
I haven’t seen any evidence of the later from the three kids I mentioned.
83cm VL puts McDonald in the top 10 of last years testing results at the combine, if that’s not outstanding I don’t know what isYou didn’t see McDonald’s pack mark jumping from behind in the 2nd quarter? McDonald doesn’t have outstanding hops but it’s above average and way better than Callows. McDonald’s running vertical is 83cm which is 20cm better than Callows at 63cm. That would be alarm bells for me, if you were thinking of taking callow high in the draft as your future key forward.
Yeah I was being modest haha it’s no Ugle-Hagan though. A lot of kids in this draft have really good running verticals looking at the testing results from earlier in the year. One of those years I suspose. He’d be considered above average this year, the top 10 around the country were all above 89cm and kids that possess some of the best leaps didn’t test.83cm VL puts McDonald in the top 10 of last years testing results at the combine, if that’s not outstanding I don’t know what is
Very likely, didn’t touch the ball after QTZane Trew injured today?
Shoulder?Very likely, didn’t touch the ball after QT
No idea, will find out sooner or laterShoulder?
concussionNo idea, will find out sooner or later