Remove this Banner Ad

EGM Vote

Who you gunna pick? 9 Votes allowed

  • Peggy O'Neal (Lawyer - Incumbent)

    Votes: 53 63.9%
  • Maurice O'Shannassy (Finance - Incumbent)

    Votes: 50 60.2%
  • Malcolm Speed (Sports admin - Incumbent)

    Votes: 60 72.3%
  • Emmett Dunne (VFL - Incumbent)

    Votes: 67 80.7%
  • Rob Dalton (Auditing - Incumbent)

    Votes: 45 54.2%
  • Tony Free (AFL - Incumbent)

    Votes: 39 47.0%
  • Rex Chadwick (Advertising - Incumbent)

    Votes: 42 50.6%
  • Kerry Ryan (Lawyer - Incumbent)

    Votes: 36 43.4%
  • John O'Rourke (Investment - Incumbent)

    Votes: 47 56.6%
  • Simon Wallace (Lawyer - Independent)

    Votes: 65 78.3%
  • Martin Hiscock (Doctor - Focus on Footy)

    Votes: 15 18.1%
  • Philip Allison (IT - Focus on Footy)

    Votes: 13 15.7%
  • Bryan Wood (VFL - Focus on Footy)

    Votes: 13 15.7%
  • Margaret Kearney (Gaming - Focus on Footy)

    Votes: 13 15.7%
  • Ingrid Williams (Aged Care - Focus on Footy)

    Votes: 4 4.8%
  • David Marsh (Doctor - Focus on Footy)

    Votes: 10 12.0%
  • ABSTAIN - Member and will not be voting

    Votes: 5 6.0%

  • Total voters
    83

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

And you know this didn't happen at Richmond this year? You're making a lot of incorrect assumptions about what the board have said to the footy dept this season.

I'll give you a tip though, no board pays for an external review of its footy dept if its happy with the performance and direction of that dept.
Yeah I know but I will give you a tip. Until the board and or Benny show us the report then there is no report in my book. I say that purely based on the FACTS at hand which are the sackings movings and instigation of hiring Balme being undertaken before it was completed. So far since its completion there has been nothing happening. Funny how that shit happens I guess ;)
 
Yeah I know but I will give you a tip. Until the board and or Benny show us the report then there is no report in my book. I say that purely based on the FACTS at hand which are the sackings movings and instigation of hiring Balme being undertaken before it was completed. So far since its completion there has been nothing happening. Funny how that shit happens I guess ;)

There is no report??

You're just flinging shit for the sake of it now
 
There is no report??

You're just flinging shit for the sake of it now

yeah its a laugh at tigerland...its the club that keeps on giving. Why would you want to be anywhere else, when the tiges deliver all year round entertainment.
Everything was progressing swimmingly, members in droves, prime time games, crowds up and yep, only the tigers can disintegrate to a rabble with the click of the fingers. Its like the team when its 5 goals up cruising and one mistake and it goes from sleek to shit and 5 goals down in no time, the club just does the same.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

naaaa...shit comparison seeing as they are shit...how about Jeff and the Dawks ;)
Jeff that stated 3 flags ago they should sack Clarko, yeah that was a good call:eek:

Presidents have a job to do, it is not to motivate the team or make decisions that they are not suited to make.
 
Jeff that stated 3 flags ago they should sack Clarko, yeah that was a good call:eek:

Presidents have a job to do, it is not to motivate the team or make decisions that they are not suited to make.

yeah i for one think it was a pearler of a call that shook the place up and sent a message, that had them pull their finger out and get the ****ing job done.
On the flip side, we have a President stating that they board will be guided by Benny and signed off on a 2 year extension with no sign of someone saying Hardwick should be sacked...:thumbsu:.
 
Jeff that stated 3 flags ago they should sack Clarko, yeah that was a good call:eek:

Presidents have a job to do, it is not to motivate the team or make decisions that they are not suited to make.

We need this man as president, he is the legend of jinxes

first he says geelong can't beat hawthorn, then they gon an unbeaten run.

then he says Clarko needs to go, and then they go on to with three premierships
 
I'll say it plain and simple

If you want to hold on to a board that decided to sign on a coach for 2 further years after his coaching was questioned and bamboozled supporters and media, taken us backwards after 7 years. It's his coaching the reason players are not developing, not playing to their potential because of this WTF defensive, no tacking, possession football, then the lot of you can shut the effing up and accept shitness!
Stop complaining, when games are on, or after, when DH mocks at post match interview...

This board made that call and yet they are not in any sense taken to task...
They sack assistance coaches, then decide to have a review that no one knows much about...

It's time to move 1/2 the board on, time to move Peggy clueless on, get an attacking coach...

It's a no brainer!


RFC Lest We Forget
Well spoken.
 
We need this man as president, he is the legend of jinxes

first he says geelong can't beat hawthorn, then they gon an unbeaten run.

then he says Clarko needs to go, and then they go on to with three premierships
We just need to get him to say, Richmond won't win a flag this decade...
 
You may have seen the news that there is not going to be an EGM triggered by FoF - http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...richmond-board-challenge-20160921-grlget.html

I'm pretty happy there won't be an EGM. IMO, it is not the best way to regenerate the Board.

Having said that, sounds like there will be a contest for a few of Director positions up for grabs at the AGM - "The Malvern group, which included Stephen Mandie, Damian Silk and Robert Ralph, remain determined to gain some representation on the board and are now employing more conventional means to achieve that outcome. Fairfax Media expects a further two Richmond directors to stand down over the next month."
 

Remove this Banner Ad

rfctiger74 I want to tease something out (tying out this "@" thingy)

At an EGM, are the votes counted only from who is present, but if not, who gets the proxies or nil votes?

At an AGM, are the votes counted only from who is present, but if not, who gets the proxies or nil votes?
 
rfctiger74 I want to tease something out (tying out this "@" thingy)

At an EGM, are the votes counted only from who is present, but if not, who gets the proxies or nil votes?

At an AGM, are the votes counted only from who is present, but if not, who gets the proxies or nil votes?

No, agm/egm are lucky to have 100-200 rock up

Most people vote via proxy ballots they post back
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Good job...stand up for your principles!!
Wouldn't need to if rfctiger74 just set it up properly in the first place.

Mods need to realise if you want something done properly, don't leave it to an Essendon apologist :p
 
Yeah I wasn't clear at all...my bad...I meant if a member didn't send back the paper...is it still counted and allocated somewhere

I was trying to avoid that...

no

most agms only have 5000-7000 votes cast, so we have a massive amount that are not factored in
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom