When does the doctored footage get released?
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Review Elimination Final, 2022 - Brisbane Lions vs. Richmond
- Thread starter ZoBlitz
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Elixuh
See you on the 9th green at 9
Far out Richmond supporters are posting their manifestos in that decision thread on their board and asking for the names of the people who were in the ARC. They’ll have to put them into witness protection.
I’m in tears reading that thread. It’s so good.
I’m in tears reading that thread. It’s so good.
- May 3, 2015
- 20,667
- 23,873
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
But the ARC decision was indisputably correct.
It's honestly the craziest reaction to a line ball decision I've ever seen. Some are saying that the AFL releasing additional footage will help put this to bed - I put it to those people that nothing is changing the majority of these peoples minds. Only the fair and balanced would be convinced at that point and we can all see how few of those supporters follow the Tigs!
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It was. The argument is that is wasn't conclusive enough, yet we're supposed to go with the decision from an umpire who had such little confidence in his own decision that he called for a review.
- May 3, 2015
- 20,667
- 23,873
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Ump would have called “play on“ which what Andrews would have heard, probably a second or two before raising arms, not quite simultaneously
Elixuh
See you on the 9th green at 9
It seems to me that your only genuine recourse is to hunt down these umpires and arc officials and show them yellow and black justice
- Banned
- #709
Good call mate
- Apr 3, 2017
- 6,097
- 7,811
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
I gave up after reading 5 pages with just the same angle of footage. Ignoring depth of field as a concept completely.
Oh well I can't blame them all too much, I'm not too sure our meltdowns wouldn't be all that better.
rye
⠀
- Apr 24, 2022
- 4,311
- 12,206
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
i hope afl makes an announcement that theyre going to release the conclusive footage that shows why richmond lost then just put up a montage of starce manhandling bolton
The Flying Belgian
Uncle Pusher
- May 5, 2005
- 13,947
- 14,457
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- NYGiants | Blazers | Cardiff City
That fact people are still focussed on their reaction after nearly a week suggests this is accurate.
Gadzorks
Norm Smith Medallist
- Oct 23, 2015
- 9,829
- 17,484
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
The AFL won't cave to the demands of irate fans. And neither should they.
What the AFL and journalists need to do is start talking about the fact that even if the review was wrong THEY WERE STILL AHEAD. All they needed to do was have their KP FORWARD out of the defending goal square and their very good defenders do their job.
It's Jacky-boys fault they lost. Which makes me smile and laugh out loud. And makes the sky bluer, and the sunshine brighter.
Fact of life is that we caught a break.Once the goal umpire called it a goal we were up against it.There is no way that the ARC footage indisputably shows it to be a behind.
If they had followed their standard procedures the decision would not have been overturned.
If they had followed their standard procedures the decision would not have been overturned.
- May 5, 2013
- 2,518
- 3,341
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Yeah its as simple as an x and y marked out through the two or more camers showing the line of the ball.
And it shows the ball was on top of the post.
I'd imagine you only need one camera on the line of the goals ( X axis) and one directly in front (Y axis).
Simples.
Unless the cameras were not in sinc. mha ha ,mha ha..
Edit, just explained what I meant with the x and y being x axis , y axis , Being in brackets, just in case any Tiges were lerking
.
Last edited:
Always been a fan of K Cornes & his opinions
www.sen.com.au
Kane Cornes calls out Hardwick and Richmond over goal umpire complaints
“What you’re hearing from the AFL is that they can’t believe the carry-on from Richmond over this...”
www.sen.com.au
Nah, Richmond almost caught a break being payed a goal they didn’t kick.
Can’t blame the fans for being upset but the coaching and senior leadership staff should have put an end to the whining in the media IMO. Could you imagine Fagan sooking about it a week later?
Geez, the way majority of Richmond supporters are being abusive to us, you would think we made the final decision on whether it was a goal or not...
...anyway, they lost it themselves when 5 players couldn't stop Joe from kicking the winning goal...they might also want to re-visit the vision of when
young Wilmott was given the free because their player played on/crossed the line (just forget exactly what for) but it also shows Hardwick up in the box
very plainly calling their player a "f...ing idiot" for allowing that to happen..
Go away, read your own board, wallow in self-pity/poor us over there......we don't need you here if you are going to carry on with dillusional tripe.
...anyway, they lost it themselves when 5 players couldn't stop Joe from kicking the winning goal...they might also want to re-visit the vision of when
young Wilmott was given the free because their player played on/crossed the line (just forget exactly what for) but it also shows Hardwick up in the box
very plainly calling their player a "f...ing idiot" for allowing that to happen..
Go away, read your own board, wallow in self-pity/poor us over there......we don't need you here if you are going to carry on with dillusional tripe.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Like mentioned previously, the lucky ones who have largely escaped scrutiny are the Richmond players on the line that couldn't kill the ball over the line despite being 5 against 1. Richmond were still in front after that Lynch miss...
Just watched the replay - the umpire a bit further away calls play on before this. Doesn’t look like Andrews goes early.After watching Riewoldt on AFL 360 last night and they showed the replay again of the goal review something suddenly stuck out at me. Not sure whether been mentioned and i must admit i had the volume down but noticed when Lynch played on Andrews moved off the mark before the umpire had waved his arms for play on. Not sure whether umpire had called play on before but geez i must admit it looks like it should have been a 50metre penalty. Maybe another thing the Richmond people can be complaining about.
And Lynch himself. 800k a year for that.
- Aug 21, 2013
- 4,552
- 4,355
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
that is the point people make mistakes. Robbo missed one he normally get at the G a few weeks ago.
The Goal ump was not sure a goal or not.. Should just said not sure instead of goal.
Dimma still complaining is a bad look as I keep saying was not the last kick of the day.
2 mins was plenty of time for us to kick two.
Not happy when Fagan does not say we need to be better or mulligan stuff after we got smashed
Although Dimma, Scott, Clarko always try a distraction on a loss instead of just saying we lost
Zacs_Magic_Tooth
Team Captain
- Apr 1, 2021
- 512
- 1,307
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Send it to the Supreme Court and get the game overturned! Says one super fan on SEN. what a bunch of total numpties
Similar threads
