- May 19, 2019
- 691
- 1,382
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Maybe says a little too much about Nathan Lyon.Spin is ripping India apart, and not even good spin.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Maybe says a little too much about Nathan Lyon.Spin is ripping India apart, and not even good spin.
Perhaps, but Moeen was getting some ridiculous turn on a Day 1 pitch.Maybe says a little too much about Nathan Lyon.
Lyon has taken a bucket load of wickets in India. One of his more recent performances over there he took 13 wickets in a match. We just don’t produce pitches that suit him in Australia.Maybe says a little too much about Nathan Lyon.
Lyon has taken a bucket load of wickets in India. One of his more recent performances over there he took 13 wickets in a match. We just don’t produce pitches that suit him in Australia.
Maybe says a little too much about Nathan Lyon.
Al Hasen would be spoken about as one of the best ever if he'd played for a traditional cricket teamIf you're adding Stokes, you have to have Watson.
Their stats are extremely similar.
FWIW Stokes is the one on that list that doesn't stand out.
Shahid Afridi, Chris Cairns, Shakib al Hasan all could be in the conversation as well.
Lyon wasn't terrible but someone with his experience should be able to restrict scoring and eventually force mistakes.
Doesn't help also when bowlers like Starc don't have the patience to set a batsman up and bowl so many 4 balls.
Really? Haha that's hilariousThe home umpiring in India has been pretty terrible.
The other day the Indians went up in unison to appeal and in one camera angle you could see the square leg umpire also go up, disgraceful stuff.
Really? Haha that's hilarious
The far reaching impact of Covid!
Really? Haha that's hilarious
The far reaching impact of Covid!
That's a genuine shame!Not really
What happened?England were actually given a review back because the match ref saw how ridiculous a rejected review was.
Came clear off the glove of the batsman, English fielder caught it. Given not out, England reviewed and the evidence was conclusive.What happened?
Wow.Came clear off the glove of the batsman, English fielder caught it. Given not out, England reviewed and the evidence was conclusive.
Indian 3rd umpire gave it not out.
It was a while back.Wow.
Why didn’t they overturn the decision if they gave them the review back?
Or was it a while after?
Wow.
Why didn’t they overturn the decision if they gave them the review back?
Or was it a while after?
Probably more important for the 3rd umpire to be neutral.Came clear off the glove of the batsman, English fielder caught it. Given not out, England reviewed and the evidence was conclusive.
Indian 3rd umpire gave it not out.
There was no doubt that the batsman was out, and the 3rd umpire got it wrong. The only question was whether this should be attributed to incompetence or bias. Never attribute anything to malice, which can be easily explained by incompetence.Probably more important for the 3rd umpire to be neutral.