England vs. Australia: the only tests that matter?

swingdog

Premiership Player
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Posts
4,626
Likes
3,951
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
West Coast
Thread starter #1
Listening to the ABC boys wrap up the action after the end of play yesterday, Harsha Bogle made the point that test cricket was really only healthy in England and Australia.

I can see the Future Tours program being abandoned at some point, especially if India continues to lose games and money, compared to IPL.

If we did go back to something like the 1930s where we pretty much only played England, would this be such a bad thing?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

swingdog

Premiership Player
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Posts
4,626
Likes
3,951
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
West Coast
Thread starter #3
So do I, but if their domestic board thinks they're not worth playing, then maybe we only play them every 4 years or so.

No other series has the cachet of The Ashes and there are plenty of sports which survive with strong domestic leagues and internationals against one or two sides (e.g. rugby league).
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Posts
25,242
Likes
22,291
Location
Leafy eastern suburbs
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Cartagena C.F., NYJ, A's
Moderator #4
The trouble with South Africa is that they love their own Boxing Day test, so they're loathe to give it up to tour Australia and play a Boxing Day test away from home. That means that the tours need to be either late October/November or in March, where the weather isn't so great.

Test cricket in England is healthy because the English cricket team is currently no. 1 in the world, but it is still an insular sport. England has a mix of cultures living in the country, but it's still pretty much a white, Anglo-Saxon sport.

With the money poured into association football, plus the Olympics later this year in England, cricket needs to compete with a lot of other sports for oxygen.

Even in Australia, the focus from Cricket Australia is shifting irrevocably from test cricket to T20 cricket, as the bigger money-spinner. Scheduling zero first class games while the Big Bash is being played out is a sign of the times. First class and eventually test cricket will not matter because money is made so much more easily out of T20 cricket. You have a result in three hours and everyone goes home happy (except the bowlers, who have been pounded around the ground).
 

Punchy Bassett

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 1, 2003
Posts
13,547
Likes
8,144
Location
Adelaide, Australia
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
NFC AUFC MUFC Socceroos
#7
So do I, but if their domestic board thinks they're not worth playing, then maybe we only play them every 4 years or so.

No other series has the cachet of The Ashes and there are plenty of sports which survive with strong domestic leagues and internationals against one or two sides (e.g. rugby league).
It is a pity the Windies have fallen away so much.
 

eddiesmith

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 12, 2004
Posts
46,458
Likes
4,580
Location
Junktion Oval
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
England Cronulla
#8
Only issue with South Africa is Boxing Day, otherwise there would continue to be great 4 test series between the 2 countries

But the fact the BCCI, oops, ICC abandoned the Test championship untill 2017 is a very bad sign
 

BluesMan

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Posts
17,064
Likes
7,074
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Chelsea, B.Celtics
#9
Bloody T20 cricket, I blame you! I really hope we get over this phase and realise (worldwide) that tests are the premium. I would even get bored watching us vs. England only. That would be pointless.
 

Santana

Club Legend
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Posts
2,489
Likes
690
Location
........
#11
The obsession with the Ashes has gone way over the top recently in Australia. In fact it has gotten annoying. Most of the talk you hear today is “we’ve just got to get the Ashes back” or “we’ve got to rebuild so we can beat England next year”. What bizarre thinking. The goal should be to become the number 1 team in the world again, not just beat one side.

All test series mean something and I enjoy playing all Test nations. Playing the Ashes more then we already do would hurt the series. Which is why playing these back to back Ashes series next year is such a bad idea.

If the Ashes are the only series that means something then Test Cricket is in a really sad state of affairs.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

BluesMan

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Posts
17,064
Likes
7,074
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Chelsea, B.Celtics
#12
Rubbish typical Indian clown. Anyone with a clue knows that Test Cricket is the ultimate. If the Indians want to focus on the IPL then so be it.
Yes, but how many international player play in it. It's like the top flight t20 comp. Everyone from everywhere wants to play, obviously effecting there respected countries.
 

gbatman

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Posts
11,703
Likes
8,297
Location
Behind You...
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Justice League
#13
It would be a shame for South Africa not to play tests. India will be back, cricket is just far too big there, they just need to move on the old stagers. India will still be tough to beat at home.

The West Indies are the biggest shame in world cricket. What ever is being done over there to find players, develop players and get kids playing cricket is obviously a prime example of what not to do. Perhaps not enough money in cricket development there.

Sri Lank and New Zealand still play interesting cricket at test level, NZ just beat us in a test here remember. These sides always have at least one gun test player.

Pakistan would be a good test playing nation except their prison team is currently better than their national team. If it wasn't for corruption in their sport and them not doing enough to clean up the violence and terrorist problems in their country then they would be a fine test nation.
 

Bucking Beads

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Posts
23,626
Likes
15,356
Location
Brisbane
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
#14
Yes, but how many international player play in it. It's like the top flight t20 comp. Everyone from everywhere wants to play, obviously effecting there respected countries.
That is because they get paid millions of dollars to play. At the end of the day an IPL championship means dick opposed to a test series win.
 

Belnakor

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Posts
18,286
Likes
8,945
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
#15
the best thing about playing the Poms is that you don't have to put with the usual shit that comes from India whinging and complaining about 1) decisions, 2) crowds 3) conditions etc etc. The poms generally just get on with it.
 

BluesMan

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Posts
17,064
Likes
7,074
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Chelsea, B.Celtics
#16
That is because they get paid millions of dollars to play. At the end of the day an IPL championship means dick opposed to a test series win.
Yes I know thats why they play, and thats why tests are being rivaled (even though they shouldnt be)

Tests are the premium. Always will be. But this IPL is the main source of the problem.
 

swingdog

Premiership Player
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Posts
4,626
Likes
3,951
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
West Coast
Thread starter #17
While I can see IPL killing off one day cricket (which would be no bad thing), I can see test cricket surviving even with a diminished profile.

Might even be back on the ABC ;)

Back in the old days, Australia quite often had domestic summers where we had no touring sides. The game would struggle now if that were the case but maybe with T20 driving revenue, we might have that again.

South Africa, because of the Boxing Day clash, is a special case. Not sure how we get around that other than perhaps rotating - one year here, one year there.
 
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Posts
8,950
Likes
344
Location
Wollongong
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
North Sydney, Liverpool, NSW
#20
Rubbish typical Indian clown. Anyone with a clue knows that Test Cricket is the ultimate. If the Indians want to focus on the IPL then so be it.
He didnt dispute Test Cricket being the ultimate though from a purist point of view, he just made the point that it is clear that England and Australia are where Test cricket is far and away the preferred format of the public, and you cant really say that elsewhere (at last from a bums on seats perspective), and this could lead to much of the test calander focusing in on these areas.
 

Dipper

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 28, 2000
Posts
7,434
Likes
2,117
Location
London,England
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Allies FCC
#21
Test cricket in England is healthy because the English cricket team is currently no. 1 in the world, but it is still an insular sport. England has a mix of cultures living in the country, but it's still pretty much a white, Anglo-Saxon sport.
With all respect mate, this is absoulute rubbish.

England has been rubbish for most of the 80s all of the 90s and flattered to deceive for much of the 2000s and yet during that time the crowds flock to Test matches.

You couldn't be more off the mark in making out that England's no1 status is the reason for Test cricket being healthy in England.

Also I'm not sure what relevance the leargely white anglo-saxon make up of the side has on whether test cricket is doing well in England but your point is misguided anyway, around 90% of the population of Great Brtian is white, so you'd expect the Test side to reflect that, in the current Test squad you have Monty and Bopara, out of a squad of 16 that puts it ahead of the national average anyway.

They had Nasser Hussain as captain for a number of years as well, I don't see too many other nations having had a captain from a distinct minority group.

With the money poured into association football, plus the Olympics later this year in England, cricket needs to compete with a lot of other sports for oxygen.
This is wrong too, it's not like Australia where different sports feel that they are directly competing with one another for the same $.

Rugby, football and cricket remain as the big three with more than enough room for other sports to find their place, even league and union aren't really in competition.

Football internationals are invariably sold out as are rugby ones, Test matches tickets sell well and all this is on the back of lucrative television deals with Sky.
 

smasha

Premium Platinum
Joined
Sep 7, 2003
Posts
36,069
Likes
28,970
Location
Richmond Paddock
AFL Club
Richmond
#22
The obsession with the Ashes has gone way over the top recently in Australia. In fact it has gotten annoying. Most of the talk you hear today is “we’ve just got to get the Ashes back” or “we’ve got to rebuild so we can beat England next year”. What bizarre thinking. The goal should be to become the number 1 team in the world again, not just beat one side.

All test series mean something and I enjoy playing all Test nations. Playing the Ashes more then we already do would hurt the series. Which is why playing these back to back Ashes series next year is such a bad idea.

If the Ashes are the only series that means something then Test Cricket is in a really sad state of affairs.
West Indies firing again would be a godsend to test cricket.
 

Donnie Darko

Premiership Player
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Posts
4,372
Likes
2,161
AFL Club
Melbourne
#23


Many fans treasure an epic series with Bangladesh.


Seriously ,I can only watch test matches. never been into pyjama cricket .
20/20 is for people who dont even like cricket .Its for the hacks like Afridi and Gayle .
 

Yabba

All Australian
Joined
Jul 8, 2003
Posts
979
Likes
66
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Essendon
#24
The West Indies are the biggest shame in world cricket. What ever is being done over there to find players, develop players and get kids playing cricket is obviously a prime example of what not to do. Perhaps not enough money in cricket development there.

...

Pakistan would be a good test playing nation except their prison team is currently better than their national team. If it wasn't for corruption in their sport and them not doing enough to clean up the violence and terrorist problems in their country then they would be a fine test nation.
I think the West Indies will be better than what people think when we go to play them in April. Under Sammmy they actuallty look like a team that cares, with out the disruptive players (Gayle, Dwayne Bravo) they are starting to be competitive. They pushed India in India only a couple of bad sessions cost them wins. Darren Bravo is a real talent who could be the one they build around.

Pakistan won every series they played in 2011, I know they are playing in Dubai, but it will be a competitive series against England. Ajmal & Gul are very good bowlers. They seem to have gotten rid of 2 of the Akmals who had questions over integrity.

I think test cricket is in reasonable shape, if India were playing well it would not even be spoken about, there are enough countries playing it well for it to be in good shape.
 

JimDocker

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
5,771
Likes
3,057
Location
Fremantle
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Doncaster Rovers, Boston Celtics
#25
The obsession with the Ashes has gone way over the top recently in Australia. In fact it has gotten annoying. Most of the talk you hear today is “we’ve just got to get the Ashes back” or “we’ve got to rebuild so we can beat England next year”. What bizarre thinking. The goal should be to become the number 1 team in the world again, not just beat one side.

All test series mean something and I enjoy playing all Test nations. Playing the Ashes more then we already do would hurt the series. Which is why playing these back to back Ashes series next year is such a bad idea.

If the Ashes are the only series that means something then Test Cricket is in a really sad state of affairs.

Agree with this to an extent. I am a Pom and 45 years of age and right now is the only time in my life time when we have been the best team in the world. Australia have generally been the benchmark apart from the great South African side prior to their suspension and West Indies in the 80s.

Australia needs to focus on getting the basics right, which means having a stronger first class competition and playing ruthless cricket, which they have started doing again.

I am really looking forward to this test series between Pakistan and England as Pakistan have shown a lot of improvement and should provide a very stern test for us.

the best thing about playing the Poms is that you don't have to put with the usual shit that comes from India whinging and complaining about 1) decisions, 2) crowds 3) conditions etc etc. The poms generally just get on with it.
Very true. We are not as bad at whingeing as we are made out to be :)
 
Top Bottom