Wouldn't Liverpool's combined CL and PL title be higher?
Yet we're still above Leeds in the table despite not winning in 7..
That is entirely against the purpose of the rule... the spirit of the rule is its there to stop the rich getting richer. Clearly needs modifications based on reality.
Is the spirit of the rule not to stop people just throwing massive amounts of money at the wall and the club going bust? If Everton were allowed to continue to rack up huge losses and then somehow found themselves relegated, would they not be in massive financial trouble?
We are about to be relegated with a 700 million dollar stadium debt coming because we can’t buy players...
But you have debt because you bought sh*t players..
The stadium debt has nothing to do with it because FFP doesn't block that spend.
I'll allow it.
There's got to be some sort of consequence for spunking millions on sh*t players, apart from clubs with owners with bottomless pockets throwing more money at it.
Yes but which is more relevant to the club going bust? Which as you said is the purpose of the FFP rules.
200 million in player spend or 700 million spend in stadium spend?
I reckon investing in capital like the new stadium isn't going to make the club go bust as it's an asset for the club, not players that you overpay for and burn money on sacking managers.
Overspending on more players and more sh*t managers won't help.
Except players are assets, can't sell a player for a premium if they are in an unperforming team. Need to bring in more players to protect the other players asset value.