EPL Matchday 17

[DaRick]

Why? We’ve been dire for ages unde him, had to be sacked, especially after that dismal effort against the scouse.

They were far more lenient towards Moyes, who was faring about as badly and who had a far lesser record.

Not saying Mou didn't deserve to be sacked.

 

[PP34]

They were far more lenient towards Moyes, who was faring about as badly and who had a far lesser record.

Not saying Mou didn't deserve to be sacked.

Moyes had less time and less money given to him.

Jose had well and truly worn out his welcome.

 

[Cruyff14]

Gutted, hoped he'd never leave.

Anyone know how much they'l have to pay him out?

24m pounds.

 

[SM]

They were far more lenient towards Moyes, who was faring about as badly and who had a far lesser record.

Not saying Mou didn't deserve to be sacked.

Lenient?? Moyes lasted half a season, mou has been there two and a half.

 

[Andonis1997]

 

[Zidane98]

Lenient?? Moyes lasted half a season, mou has been there two and a half.

I thought Moyes was given the boot with just a handful of games remaining with Giggs taking over as interim.

 

[SM]

I thought Moyes was given the boot with just a handful of games remaining with Giggs taking over as interim.

I didn't mean literally 19 games.

 

[jod23]

Gutting news. But also quite hilarious.

 

[DaRick]

Lenient?? Moyes lasted half a season, mou has been there two and a half.

I should have written that better.

Moyes declined pretty much from the outset, Mou has declined this season after a decent (but not great) 2017/18.

They gave Moyes a bit more time to work through his decline than they did Mou, even though it was pretty obvious that neither would recover.

Truth be told, Man U should have sacked Mou some time earlier - in fact, as early as the off-season if they could. Mou always declines during his third season and at Chelsea said decline was absolutely brutal.

 

[SM]

I should have written that better.

Moyes declined pretty much from the outset, Mou has declined this season after a decent (but not great) 2017/18.

They gave Moyes a bit more time to work through his decline than they did Mou, even though it was pretty obvious that neither would recover.

Truth be told, Man U should have sacked Mou some time earlier - in fact, as early as the off-season if they could. Mou always declines during his third season and at Chelsea said decline was absolutely brutal.

Well exactly, so they were more lenient on Mou.

 

[DEVO]

He seemed like a perfect fit for a Manchester club, gloomy, depressing and rather boring/bland. Maybe Man City is the perfect fit for the Chosen one.

Anyway happy for Klopp, gets him sacked again.

 

[BackOnOurPerch]

Feel sorry for Moaninho, he only signed up for a new deal not that long ago. He should have been given a fair chance to implement his plan for Man United moving forward.

 

[Sub_Zero]

He seemed like a perfect fit for a Manchester club, gloomy, depressing and rather boring/bland. Maybe Man City is the perfect fit for the Chosen one.

Anyway happy for Klopp, gets him sacked again.

What do you mean "again"?

 

[DEVO]

What do you mean "again"?

I heard on the News that it was the third time Mourinho had been sacked after losing to a Klopp managed Team, but it wasn't true.
Can't trust the Channel 7 News.
He was sacked from Real Madrid in 2013, but it was a few weeks after losing to Klopp's Borussia Dortmund, and then in 2015 he was sacked from Chelsea, again, a few weeks after losing to Liverpool.

 

[SM]

He seemed like a perfect fit for a Manchester club, gloomy, depressing and rather boring/bland. Maybe Man City is the perfect fit for the Chosen one.

Anyway happy for Klopp, gets him sacked again.

EDIT: Covered lol.