EPL Matchday 19

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Zidane98

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Posts
33,598
Likes
13,657
Location
South End, AAMI Park
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Socceroos, Liverpool, Victory
But you didn't complain about him flopping...

I give up, I can't debate anything with a subspecies.
No shit sherlock - I am talking about those who didnt complain about DCL flopping but are complaining about Salah flopping.

Its the same scenario but the reactions to both incidents couldnt be greater by certain posters.

I think it is pretty obvious why that is the case to most reasonable people.
 

WealstoneRaider

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Posts
11,921
Likes
6,647
AFL Club
Hawthorn
The last page illustrates exactly why so many people don’t want Liverpool to win the league. Winning the league isn’t enough for them - they’ve got to win it by being the victims of a continual mass conspiracy against them. FFS
 

Bradesmaen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Posts
34,045
Likes
8,537
Location
London
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
SJ Sharks/Everton/NY Jets
No shit sherlock - I am talking about those who didnt complain about DCL flopping but are complaining about Salah flopping.

Its the same scenario but the reactions to both incidents couldnt be greater by certain posters.

I think it is pretty obvious why that is the case to most reasonable people.
But... if you didn't complain despite it being AGAINST your team... then why would anyone else complain? It's like a brick wall.
 

Zidane98

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Posts
33,598
Likes
13,657
Location
South End, AAMI Park
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Socceroos, Liverpool, Victory
The last page illustrates exactly why so many people don’t want Liverpool to win the league. Winning the league isn’t enough for them - they’ve got to win it by being the victims of a continual mass conspiracy against them. FFS
And your thoughts on there being a conspiracy with LFC and the FA being the reason why Salah didnt receive a retrospective ban?
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Posts
71,734
Likes
91,467
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
Tottenham, Bushrangers
And your thoughts on there being a conspiracy with LFC and the FA being the reason why Salah didnt receive a retrospective ban?
Because the rules are inadequate.
Only a dive without touching that fools the ref gets done. Anything less gets overlooked

Yet that is exonerated.
Rules with the best intentions are often let down by shoddy execution.

It was a pathetic dive, along with many others like it that’ll continue to go unpunished so long as the rules are not up to scratch.
 

Zidane98

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Posts
33,598
Likes
13,657
Location
South End, AAMI Park
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Socceroos, Liverpool, Victory
But... if you didn't complain despite it being AGAINST your team... then why would anyone else complain? It's like a brick wall.
Jesus you really need to learn comprehension.

Both incidents were fouls. Both players flopped and went down too easily.

The reaction to both should be the same but wasnt by certain posters. Not that difficult to understand.
 

WealstoneRaider

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Posts
11,921
Likes
6,647
AFL Club
Hawthorn
And your thoughts on there being a conspiracy with LFC and the FA being the reason why Salah didnt receive a retrospective ban?
Ummm exactly Zidane there is no conspiracy. Liverpool get more rub than most, being a big club and that. But all we ever hear from you lot is how victimised you are
 
Likes: SM
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Posts
71,734
Likes
91,467
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
Tottenham, Bushrangers
Ummm exactly Zidane there is no conspiracy. Liverpool get more rub than most, being a big club and that. But all we ever hear from you lot is how victimised you are
They were victims of a conspiracy last season when there was a correct non offside call, and a correct pen call with a kick in the leg.

Imagine when there’s a genuine non penalty decision...
 

Bradesmaen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Posts
34,045
Likes
8,537
Location
London
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
SJ Sharks/Everton/NY Jets
Jesus you really need to learn comprehension.

Both incidents were fouls. Both players flopped and went down too easily.

The reaction to both should be the same but wasnt by certain posters. Not that difficult to understand.
I think you have lost any idea of what you are arguing about. No liverpool fan complained about DCL flopping... so why would anyone else do it?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Zidane98

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Posts
33,598
Likes
13,657
Location
South End, AAMI Park
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Socceroos, Liverpool, Victory
Because the rules are inadequate.
Only a dive without touching that fools the ref gets done. Anything less gets overlooked

Yet that is exonerated.
Rules with the best intentions are often let down by shoddy execution.

It was a pathetic dive, along with many others like it that’ll continue to go unpunished so long as the rules are not up to scratch.
It was a foul on a player that must have had at least a dozen legitimate penalties denied against him at Anfiield going back to Oct 17. Yeah he went down too easily but its a foul and you can see it in the reaction of Dummet who didnt protest.

The rules were not brought in for a scenario like this where an actual foul was commited by a defender with a deliberate action to impede his opponent.
 

Zidane98

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Posts
33,598
Likes
13,657
Location
South End, AAMI Park
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Socceroos, Liverpool, Victory
I think you have lost any idea of what you are arguing about. No liverpool fan complained about DCL flopping... so why would anyone else do it?
Good god you are something else.

Gary Neville complained about it - does that mean he is automatically guilty of simulation? Going by your warped logic.
 

Bradesmaen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Posts
34,045
Likes
8,537
Location
London
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
SJ Sharks/Everton/NY Jets
Good god you are something else.

Gary Neville complained about it - does that mean he is automatically guilty of simulation? Going by your warped logic.
You and your point are so far apart you may as well be using satellite communications.
 

WealstoneRaider

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Posts
11,921
Likes
6,647
AFL Club
Hawthorn
I think you have lost any idea of what you are arguing about. No liverpool fan complained about DCL flopping... so why would anyone else do it?
We play you lot on the last day off the season. If by some miracle we need to win that match to be champions I’m sure you lot know what to do - just for the sake of sanity on this board if nothing else. Of course that would give them a conspiracy to really indulge in
 

Zidane98

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Posts
33,598
Likes
13,657
Location
South End, AAMI Park
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Socceroos, Liverpool, Victory
You and your point are so far apart you may as well be using satellite communications.
My points pretfy clear - those who call for retrospective bans against players that flop under minimal contact should be doing so for all players that do it. Not just LFC players.

Apologise if that is a bit too difficult for you to understand.
 

Bradesmaen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Posts
34,045
Likes
8,537
Location
London
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
SJ Sharks/Everton/NY Jets
My points pretfy clear - those who call for retrospective bans against players that flop under minimal contact should be doing so for all players that do it. Not just LFC players.

Apologise if that is a bit too difficult for you to understand.
I understood it plainly and simply. You can't seem to understand that if no one complains about a player supposedly taking a flop, not even the fans of the opposing team who got a penalty against them.. then why should I complain about it being a flop and want him held to the same standard? It's really basic understanding of the English language that you seem incapable of grasping. I did mention the other day about your infantile logic and it's rearing its head again.
 

moomba

TheBrownDog
Joined
Oct 3, 2001
Posts
51,761
Likes
15,326
Location
Timperley
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Man City
My points pretfy clear - those who call for retrospective bans against players that flop under minimal contact should be doing so for all players that do it. Not just LFC players.

Apologise if that is a bit too difficult for you to understand.
You didn't complain about Fenerbahce breaching FFP rules, therefore I expect we'll not hear from you any more on the topic.
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Posts
71,734
Likes
91,467
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
Tottenham, Bushrangers
Some of these posts illustrate why people don't want Pool winning the league. Every time I wouldn't mind seeing them winning it, I then remember what happened when Richmond won the flag. This'll be the same.
It was horrible. First time in like forever I cheered on a Magpies win.
Only so much smoke blown up Jack Graham and Rance's arse that can be tolerated. 2018 was an awful season to endure.
 

Zidane98

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Posts
33,598
Likes
13,657
Location
South End, AAMI Park
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Socceroos, Liverpool, Victory
I understood it plainly and simply. You can't seem to understand that if no one complains about a player supposedly taking a flop, not even the fans of the opposing team who got a penalty against them.. then why should I complain about it being a flop and want him held to the same standard? It's really basic understanding of the English language that you seem incapable of grasping. I did mention the other day about your infantile logic and it's rearing its head again.
Gary Neville and many pundits complained about the DCL penalty. Now I know it is really difficult for someone with comprehension levels of yours to understand but that certainly doesn't equate to "nobody complaining" about the penalty. That is understanding of English at a basic level but I expect nothing more from someone who claimed the ball was out of bounds at the end of the MSD when it clearly was not.
 

ADL9798

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Aug 18, 2009
Posts
10,909
Likes
11,685
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Liverpool
They were victims of a conspiracy last season when there was a correct non offside call, and a correct pen call with a kick in the leg.

Imagine when there’s a genuine non penalty decision...
??
 

RossFC

Moderator
Joined
May 23, 2012
Posts
40,013
Likes
58,903
Location
Alberton Oval
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Liverpool
Thread starter Moderator #300
We play you lot on the last day off the season. If by some miracle we need to win that match to be champions I’m sure you lot know what to do - just for the sake of sanity on this board if nothing else. Of course that would give them a conspiracy to really indulge in
Everton are experts at laying down.

They did the same for Arsenal 2 years ago on the last matchday when they were hoping we’d draw with Boro and come 5th.

We won and Everton got belted for no reason.
 
Top Bottom