There is a video at the bottom of this - https://www.foxsports.com.my/footba...rpools-goal-vs-wolves-is-deemed-inconclusive/Haven't seen it - link?
I’m still not even sure what they are basing it on. If it’s the hand it’s a joke, if it’s the foot, well it’s hardly advantageous but I guess to the letter of the law it’s offside. It’s also not a clear and obvious error so referees decision should stand too but who knows the actual rules anymore.So I presume you feel like the Wolves goal should have been ruled out? Law is the law after all.
The ball doesn't appear to change direction if it did hit his arm, only after it hits his chest. So you can see why this isn't conclusiveLooks to me from the video that it hits his hand.