Yet he cost you the game. Dier was terrible too.VVD was not gash at all he dominated in the air all game. Dier was though, far too vanilla and easy to disposses under pressure.
Salah might have ended Vertonghen's career though
Agree, but after it looked like Salah wins them a game, I'd take a point every day of the week. We lose from that situation 98 times out of 100.
Just saw a replay. He's definitely onside.
Vertonghen has regularly been gash against decent right forward typesVVD was not gash at all he dominated in the air all game. Dier was though, far too vanilla and easy to disposses under pressure.
Salah might have ended Vertonghen's career though
Lucky man. I got up for the second half thought I'd see an ugly scoreline and go back to bed. Now I'm up an hour before I'm meant to be.
Haha Ive not seen one pundit or anyone watching the game who didnt say the second was a clear pen. Even most of the people in this thread said it was clear. Youre categorically wrong on this one. He clearly kicked him in teh back of the leg.
Did Lovren play at the ball and get a touch
Nah, you could hear what they were saying on teh Sky Sports stream. He was saying that if Lovren didnt play at and touch teh ball Kane was offside. Moss said that he did touch it and therefore Kane was no longer offside. I dont actually agree with that interpretation of teh rule because Kane is influencing the play by being there, but that's what was said.
Because Lovren got a touch on it so it's a new pass played. The whole passive things up for interpretation though because if Lovren just leaves it falls to Kane and he is off.
Haha so Gary Neville, Martin Tyler, Jamie Redknapp, Graeme Souness and Jamie Carragher must all be delusional then. All agreed it was a pen.
