pantskyle
I'm nice now
- Oct 1, 2007
- 127,511
- 129,822
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Storm-Man Utd-Heart-Luton-Patriots
He probably just gave him his regards and things were misinterpreted.
CARLO IS BLOODBATH?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He probably just gave him his regards and things were misinterpreted.
zero percent chance of saving it. If there had been even a 1% chance that he could pull of a worldlie then I would agree with you that it was offside. As it was he was in mid air as the shot was deflected and basically landed as the ball went past him
Must disagree here. De Gea is going the other way. He's been done by the deflection. He absolutely has 0% chance to save that.Quite ridiculous to say that the goalkeeper had zero percent chance of playing the ball. Siggurdson had to dummy the ball, you can see on the replay that De Gea is distracted by that so it has to be offside. You won't find too many situations where a player is positioned right in front of a keeper when a shot on goal goes in the net where a goal is given.
I’m not sure it’s irrelevant as there have been many cases a goal keeper has had a player in an offside position in his eyeline but the goal stood as they had no impact on the goal being scored.That's irrelevant to the offside law but in any case not true either. He's offside under the laws of the game.
I’m not sure it’s irrelevant as there have been many cases a goal keeper has had a player in an offside position in his eyeline but the goal stood as they had no impact on the goal being scored.
The Rule as I understand it is denying the keeper a chance to make a play at the ball. A ball that is so far from him that he has no play on it would seem to fall outside this
You can't lie down in front of the keeper and say that because the shot was deflected into the corner that it's not offside. If you don't think sigurdsson was distracting De Gea then you are lying to yourself.
Certainly distracted him so much that De Gea watched the ball all the wayYou can't lie down in front of the keeper and say that because the shot was deflected into the corner that it's not offside. If you don't think sigurdsson was distracting De Gea then you are lying to yourself.
Quite ridiculous to say that the goalkeeper had zero percent chance of playing the ball. Siggurdson had to dummy the ball, you can see on the replay that De Gea is distracted by that so it has to be offside. You won't find too many situations where a player is positioned right in front of a keeper when a shot on goal goes in the net where a goal is given.
Should that have been offside?I mean, the beach ball distracted Reina..
The ball made an obvious motionShould that have been offside?
Should that have been offside?
Exactly, the beachball didn't make an obvious actionThe ball hit the beachball.
If the beach ball played for the opposition then it would have been offsideI mean, Reina couldn't track the ball because the beach ball was in the way. Clearly unfair obstruction of his line of sight.
I’m not sure it’s irrelevant as there have been many cases a goal keeper has had a player in an offside position in his eyeline but the goal stood as they had no impact on the goal being scored.
The Rule as I understand it is denying the keeper a chance to make a play at the ball. A ball that is so far from him that he has no play on it would seem to fall outside this
If the beach ball played for the opposition then it would have been offside
So if the ball missed the beach ball by a half a foot then it would be fine then?Because the ball hit the beach ball.
So if the ball missed the beach ball by a half a foot then it would be fine then?