He's somehow trying to defend Alexander Arnold by saying the throwing of the ball away petulantly is justified cause it was a foul. You know, two wrongs make a right
PAL
0 v WAN
0 PM
STM
0 v NCL
0 PM
WAR
0 v SD
0 PM
SYD
0 v MAC
0 PM
ORL
0 v DET
0 PM
SA
0 v CHI
0 PM
PHI
0 v ATL
0 PM
PHX
0 v SAC
0 PM
CHA
0 v TOR
0 PM
ADE
0 v CNS
0 PM
OKC
0 v GS
0 PM
MIA
0 v CLE
0 PM
DEN
0 v HOU
0 PM
UTH
0 v LAC
0 PM
POR
0 v DAL
0 PM
WEL
0 v NEW
0 PM
BRO
0 v WSH
0 PM
BOS
0 v NY
0 PM
MEM
0 v MIN
0 PM
TOR
103 v MIA
112 FT
ATL
113 v BRO
114 FT
WSH
126 v PHI
131 FT
DAL
147 v UTH
97 FT
LAL
133 v NO
89 FT
PIT
18 v NE
21 FT
MIN
102 v SA
94 FT
LAC
111 v DEN
102 FT
ILL
100 v PER
82 FT
CHI
111 v CHA
100 FT
OCB
128 v RGV
126 FT
HOU
110 v OKC
101 FT
CCM
4 v WUN
0 FT
CNS
83 v SYD
86 FT
PER
1 v MCY
2 FT
DET
102 v MEM
116 FT
CLE
121 v ORL
111 FT
MIL
119 v IND
128 FT
GS
110 v POR
106 FT
Premier Lg EPL Matchday 3 - On Optus Sport
- Thread starter RossFC
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Premier League Football
People who use "two wrongs don't make a right" never seem to explain how "one wrong does make a right".
In the real world, "two wrongs don't make a right" but "two wrongs can be closer to a fairer outcome".
Not sure how throwing away a ball is a fairer outcome. Nor do I see anyone saying one wrong makes a right.
- Aug 21, 2016
- 15,140
- 23,396
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Oldham
Gordon bumps TAA in the back and sends him off the field. No free kick. Wrong.
TAA throws the ball away. Yellow card. Right.
TAA arm over the shoulder to stop Gordon. No 2nd yellow. Wrong.
Two wrongs and one right and we ended up with a fair outcome that TAA was not sent off. Only the ref would know whether he put the two incidents together to adjudge that it wasn't worthy of a red card.
Can we keep playing this game?
Gordon kicks the ball away. No yellow card. Wrong.
Exactly. So if you can’t make it right, you can make it fair.
Let's make it fair by relegating Liverpool
Yep, need to keep the Merseyside derby going next season.
The ref didn't think it was a foul at the time (wrongly imo). Why would he give any consideration to Alexander Arnold's petulance?
I dunno, probably for the same reason he watched Gordon kick the ball away from a Liverpool free kick less than 30 seconds afterwards?
- Aug 21, 2016
- 15,140
- 23,396
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Oldham
Like I said, maybe he put the two incidents together to deem that it wasn't worthy of a red card.
Was talking about the yellow, he thought Alexander wasn't fouled and he threw the ball away. His only decision once he'd deemed no foul was whether or not it was worthy of a yellow.
According to the new guidance it was imo.
As for the second yellow, he bottled the decision like many refs do.
- Oct 28, 2012
- 102,025
- 138,831
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Bushrangers - Tottenham
Very unbecoming and unsportsmanlike from a club captain.
Virgil van Dijk: Liverpool defender charged by FA after red card against Newcastle - FA charges Van Dijk after Newcastle red card
Benefits Liverpool given how bad he has been playing
- Moderator
- #393
Welcome back mate.
