Was reaching, out of control and over the ball, clear red.
PAL
0 v WAN
0 PM
STM
0 v NCL
0 PM
WAR
0 v SD
0 PM
SYD
0 v MAC
0 PM
ORL
0 v DET
0 PM
SA
0 v CHI
0 PM
PHI
0 v ATL
0 PM
PHX
0 v SAC
0 PM
CHA
0 v TOR
0 PM
ADE
0 v CNS
0 PM
OKC
0 v GS
0 PM
MIA
0 v CLE
0 PM
DEN
0 v HOU
0 PM
UTH
0 v LAC
0 PM
POR
0 v DAL
0 PM
WEL
0 v NEW
0 PM
BRO
0 v WSH
0 PM
BOS
0 v NY
0 PM
MEM
0 v MIN
0 PM
TOR
103 v MIA
112 FT
ATL
113 v BRO
114 FT
WSH
126 v PHI
131 FT
DAL
147 v UTH
97 FT
LAL
133 v NO
89 FT
PIT
18 v NE
21 FT
MIN
102 v SA
94 FT
LAC
111 v DEN
102 FT
ILL
100 v PER
82 FT
CHI
111 v CHA
100 FT
OCB
128 v RGV
126 FT
HOU
110 v OKC
101 FT
CCM
4 v WUN
0 FT
CNS
83 v SYD
86 FT
PER
1 v MCY
2 FT
DET
102 v MEM
116 FT
CLE
121 v ORL
111 FT
MIL
119 v IND
128 FT
GS
110 v POR
106 FT
Premier Lg EPL Matchday 7 - On Optus Sport
- Thread starter RossFC
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Premier League Football
- Status
- Moderator
- #702
Potential of a replay?
What about the Diaz thing?
- Sep 18, 2014
- 21,596
- 19,406
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Man United, San Antonio Spurs
MD7 has certainly been something.
- Sep 30, 2017
- 902
- 1,623
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
I haven’t really seen a good argument.
Holding a candle light vigil at the FA
surprised it hasnt been mentioned myself
There have been so many games replayed when there have been wrong decisions. Surely the FA do this too to make things right.
- Aug 18, 2009
- 14,343
- 16,708
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Lol, ouch, you big melt. Which of my 5 posts in this thread got your goat in particular?
- Aug 18, 2009
- 14,343
- 16,708
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
He bloody earned it too. No-one in the history of BF has worked harder for a ban than Zidane in this thread.
Just surprised they needed VAR to confirm such an obvious offside.
So by all accounts Liverpool now have the VAR audio. Right thing to do imo (and should be available to any club that requests it,).
Maybe they'll find the smoking gun they're hoping for, but think it more likely it will just show that PGMOL/VAR just isn't very competent. Just on this occasion Liverpool were on the wrong end of a VAR cockup.
Maybe they'll find the smoking gun they're hoping for, but think it more likely it will just show that PGMOL/VAR just isn't very competent. Just on this occasion Liverpool were on the wrong end of a VAR cockup.
- Apr 2, 2000
- 73,883
- 24,586
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Chicago Bulls.
I dont mind the back and forth mate. It's all fun and games but perhaps word it better than "Always the victims" as that statement is always associated with Hillsborough and I'm sure you of course dont mean it that way but it's best not to say stuff like that.
Next Monday apparently.
Noted: no one can use always the victims ever again.
- Apr 2, 2000
- 73,883
- 24,586
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Chicago Bulls.
On the process of VAR you would think a simple little program could be made to link up to a decision and you have like 3-4 check points you need to turn green to like say its done.
Rather than just chatting to each other. Would be a foolproof system you would think.
Rather than just chatting to each other. Would be a foolproof system you would think.
People complain about how long it takes and now you want to introduce that? Might as well postpone your dinner cause it'll take 3 hours for a game.
- Apr 2, 2000
- 73,883
- 24,586
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Chicago Bulls.
How would it take three hours? A simple computer program with 3-4 steps. Each one is Red. You run through the protocols one by one and turn them green to say you have done them. It's fairly simple. Would be done in 20-30 seconds.
That is fine but then someone got upset about victim mentality as well like the word victim is now banned for talking about some Liverpool supporters actions
- Apr 2, 2000
- 73,883
- 24,586
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Chicago Bulls.
It's just not difficult to be careful with your words is all. The term "victim mentality" is heavily linked with Hillsborough and it's just best not to use when talking about Liverpool or their fans. Just dont use it. It's not really that hard.
This whole mess from Zidane and everyone else egging him on in this thread was silly.
I'm not even bothered about losing the game. We had some iffy card situations that went against us, that happens to every club every weekend. Could Jones not have been sent off? Yeah probably. Could Jota's first yellow not have been a yellow? Yeah, probably. Was he dumb to dive in a minute later? Absolutely.
Was it then going to be very tough to hold out for a draw away from home against a good side with 9 men? Absolutely. In the end we didnt manage it.
Im not bothered about the game personally. I'm confident we are a very good side and sure losing was a setback but I think we can challenge for everything this season and we go again mid-week.
What does bother me and what was lost in this thread amongst all the tribalism was the state of refereeing in England and how they can make such mistakes like the Diaz goal. It absolutely needs to be scrutinized and hopefully something good can come from it in the future. The Diaz one is the biggest and worst of all the VAR mistakes but it's certainly not the first and we are certainly not the only club to be disadvantaged by it.
But that all just got lost in the s**t fight in this thread. But then again, that's just classic BigFooty I guess haha.
- Feb 1, 2010
- 38,161
- 19,443
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur, Brentford FC
I was more going off the fact that you played the victim in the Evra Suarez incident and many other incidents across the recent years. And statistically proven to be the most kissed on the dick side with VAR since its inception and have played the victim massively here, especially when you compare to the way clubs like SHU handled stuff ups that got them relegated
Didn't realise the term stemmed from something that far back
- Status
