- Aug 18, 2009
- 14,527
- 16,984
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
There's agreement that there's no law about deflection but I don't agree with the ESPN pundits. Van Dijk made his body unnaturally bigger by the position of his arm. As the law states, by having his arm in such a position, he took the risk of his arm being hit by the ball and being penalised.
That is where a still doesn’t show the context as there was nothing unnatural about it.
It’s a selectively chosen freeze frame.
Here’s another one 0.0001 seconds earlier (after the ball hits his thigh but before it hits his arm), his arm hasn’t been knocked out to the side yet and is very much down in a ‘natural position’.
8min 5sec mark in this video