Epstein

Remove this Banner Ad

Is he? Or do you loosely mean sociopath in the Reddit mould?
I'll take a textbook definition, thanks.

A sociopath is a term used to describe someone who has antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). People with ASPD can’t understand others’ feelings. They’ll often break rules or make impulsive decisions without feeling guilty for the harm they cause.

People with ASPD may also use “mind games” to control friends, family members, co-workers, and even strangers. They may also be perceived as charismatic or charming.


  1. Doesn’t respect social norms or laws. They consistently break laws or overstep social boundaries.
  2. Lies, deceives others, uses false identities or nicknames, and uses others for personal gain.
  3. Doesn’t make any long-term plans. They also often behave without thinking of consequences.
  4. Shows aggressive or aggravated behavior. They consistently get into fights or physically harm others.
  5. Doesn’t consider their own safety or the safety of others.
  6. Doesn't follow up on personal or professional responsibilities. This can include repeatedly being late to work or not paying bills on time.
  7. Doesn’t feel guilt or remorse for having harmed or mistreated others.
 
Yes. I noted before that I'm not normally one for conspiracy theories but there are just too many coincidences here to suggest Epstein's death is a suicide. The only difference is who we suspect is behind it, if there even is merely one person behind it.

For all we know Epstein's circle had "fixers" whose job it is to hide their shenanigans and Clinton, Trump, Prince Andrew and other billionaires have all had a hand in hiding everything that went on.

let’s not forget the other politician, ehud barak
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The surety which which people think Bill is the only person who could possibly be responsible is ridiculous considering of the three listed he's no longer in the public eye and has far less to lose than the other two.
Why would Clinton have far less to lose than Prince Andrew?
 
Yes. I noted before that I'm not normally one for conspiracy theories but there are just too many coincidences here to suggest Epstein's death is a suicide. The only difference is who we suspect is behind it, if there even is merely one person behind it.

For all we know Epstein's circle had "fixers" whose job it is to hide their shenanigans and Clinton, Trump, Prince Andrew and other billionaires have all had a hand in hiding everything that went on.

Agree it is most likely a 'group' of connected powerful offenders with much to lose.

That counts The Don out as he is an establishment outsider, and is so bad at keeping his big mouth shut he cant even do a secret phone call properly.

IF you were going to knock someone off, you wouldn't have Donald John Trump in your inner conspiracy circle unless you want twitter to know about his tremendous and perfect prison hit, and how it moved the Dow Jones to record levels.
 
Imo the most reasonable argument for conspiracy is that the rag trade is one big sex trafficking operation. Girls are lured into becoming models for Victoria Secret etc, those who don’t make it churned into having sex all the way down to becoming street hookers. Epstein ran the operation at the highest level and knew too much, therefore was killed.
 
Why would Clinton have far less to lose than Prince Andrew?
You mean why would someone retired and out of the public eye have less to lose than the 8th in line to the throne who in just the past 48 hours has lost a number of sponsors to Pitch Palace?

 
Agree it is most likely a 'group' of connected powerful offenders with much to lose.

That counts The Don out as he is an establishment outsider, and is so bad at keeping his big mouth shut he cant even do a secret phone call properly.

IF you were going to knock someone off, you wouldn't have Donald John Trump in your inner conspiracy circle unless you want twitter to know about his tremendous and perfect prison hit, and how it moved the Dow Jones to record levels.
Mar a Lago seems to have been a fertile hunting ground for Epstein's operation though.
One step removed plausible deniability. Did enjoy the post though, fair points.
 
You mean why would someone retired and out of the public eye have less to lose than the 8th in line to the throne who in just the past 48 hours has lost a number of sponsors to Pitch Palace?

Clinton isn’t out of the public eye, nor do his family’s business dealings mean he is retired.

lol at eighth in line to the throne.
 
Clinton isn’t out of the public eye, nor do his family’s business dealings mean he is retired.

lol at eighth in line to the throne.
So what do you think he has to lose, and why do you think it is more than Prince Andrew, given you seem to take issue with the opinion?
 
So what do you think he has to lose, and why do you think it is more than Prince Andrew, given you seem to take issue with the opinion?
The Clinton family are still very much in the public eye. His wife is still regarded as a potential presidential candidate. Being caught up in a scandal like this would also ruin whatever ambitions they have for Chelsea.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Let us set up a hypothetical scenario here, and work out what type of person would more likely be so cheap and desperate for sex he needs access to sex slaves.

Who is more likely to want to knock off Epstein to silence him about shagging underage sex slaves?

Is it:

Person A: This person is a billionaire who shags the most beautiful women in the world. He also owns a beauty pageant. He is currently married to a former supermodel.

Person B: Wakes up next to Hillary in the morning.

Person C. Was married to Sarah Ferguson, and is so desperate to fornicate with something anything he's known to have had a stab at mums corgies.

Probably all three.

There is a whole category of sex offending where the motivation is not sexual, but in exercising power and control over other people. Sociopaths, tyrants, people with superiority complexes or narcissist tendencies involving privilege and entitlement and that sort of thing. These people prey upon victims not to gratify their sexual desires but to gratify their personality disorders.
 
You mean why would someone retired and out of the public eye have less to lose than the 8th in line to the throne who in just the past 48 hours has lost a number of sponsors to Pitch Palace?

Pitch@Palace aka Andy's World Travel Slush Fund.
 
I would have believed it if Acosta didn't receive such a reward under Trump's administration. The swamp is a boys club (as you'd expect).

I'm not normally one for conspiracy theories but there are just too many coincidences here to suggest Epstein's death is a suicide.
If Trump took 26 trips to Epstein's private island and had a creepy half naked painting of himself as a woman in his residency, you'd be all over that. Clinton is as disgusting as they come and is certainly involved in this elitist paedophile network.
 
If Trump took 26 trips to Epstein's private island and had a creepy half naked painting of himself as a woman in his residency, you'd be all over that. Clinton is as disgusting as they come and is certainly involved in this elitist paedophile network.
Yes, he is.
Nobody here defends Clinton. Plenty here defend Trump though, who has a far greater number of sexual assault allegations than Clinton.
 
Doesn’t Bill have a rape allegation made against him as well as a dozen sexual assault allegations?
Check the link for yourself. It's only one page back.

The conservative narrative that "Clinton is bad therefore Trump is innocent" is logically baffling.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top