HyperAgressiveDonk
Cancelled
- Banned
- #51
Will play finals this year.
Out of the sides that didn't make the 8 last year. Who are you better than? I think North Melbourne, Adelaide, Port Adelaide and Melbourne are in line to make the 8 before Essendon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Will play finals this year.
A general question to Essendon supporters - is M McVeigh seriously in your best 22?
Out of the sides that didn't make the 8 last year. Who are you better than? I think North Melbourne, Adelaide, Port Adelaide and Melbourne are in line to make the 8 before Essendon
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
A general question to Essendon supporters - is M McVeigh seriously in your best 22?
Out of the sides that didn't make the 8 last year. Who are you better than? I think North Melbourne, Adelaide, Port Adelaide and Melbourne are in line to make the 8 before Essendon
I know that we got the best coach in the AFL and made him our assistant, that should help a little bit.
yes he is for sure. Will have a big year.
Rather have him than some of the spuds running round for geelong.
Wow!
I could say a lot of things but suffice to that, if your prognosis comes true, then it suggest those cats are in for an awful year.
It's a shame threads like this can't be bumped at the end of the year.
Bottom 4 certs.
agree.
If we work on an assumption that Mark McVeigh is as you say, better than a fair few on the cats list, then its hard to disagree.
But to continue your argument who from this propsective and on th w slideCats 22 do you rate lesser than Mark McVeigh?
B: Milburn; Scarlett; Wojinski
HB: Mackie; Taylor; T.hunt
C: Enright; Bartel; Ling
HF: Chapman; Podsiadly; Varcoe
F: Johnson J; Hawkins; Menzel
Foll: Ottens; Selwood; Kelly
Bench: Simpson; Corey; Byrnes; Stokes
Yeah but there good young players are KPP. Hurley, Pears and Gumby could be elite. They just need to get some mids in - if they do that they might be ok. KPP start to come good mid 20's where as quality mids can be good from early 20's. Timing could be good if they get the mids.
If we work on an assumption that Mark McVeigh is as you say, better than a fair few on the cats list, then its hard to disagree.
But to continue your argument who from this propsective and on th w slideCats 22 do you rate lesser than Mark McVeigh?
B: Milburn; Scarlett; Wojinski
HB: Mackie; Taylor; T.hunt
C: Enright; Bartel; Ling
HF: Chapman; Podsiadly; Varcoe
F: Johnson J; Hawkins; Menzel
Foll: Ottens; Selwood; Kelly
Bench: Simpson; Corey; Byrnes; Stokes
I agree that our midfield is a weakness but I fail to see how it is easily the worst in the afl. I think it is about on par with Richmond's and West Coast's.
Richmond Midfielders - Cotchin, Edwards, Jackson, Morton, Martin, Foley, Houli, Grigg, Tuck, Webberley, Hislop, White
West Coast Midfielders - Kerr, Priddis, Masten, Ebert, Dalzeil, Rosa, Selwood's, Smith, Shuey, Stevens, Hams.
Essendon Midfielders - Watson, Stanton, Winderlich, Zaharakis, Prismall, Hocking, Colyer, Melksham, Jetta, Howlett, NLM, Myers, Welsh.
How is our midfield obviously worse than Richmond's and West Coast's?
Thats all well and good, but I in a completely unbiased opinion dont believe Knights was the problem. Where as Polo and Tambling were definately part of our problems but this isn't about Richmond.
This is not the bay - my assessment was fair. End of the day you finished 3rd last - all I did was descride the 3rd worse team in the comp. But feel free to rasie any points you do not agree with. I think you will find they are close to the mark.
It's not that essendon will worse, its that all the other teams will have made progress forward. For instance Scott for us has done what Knights failed to do for 3 years. All the other developing teams have already identified the next gen players where essendon is still searching for the right players and that could take time and cost essendon games.
lol wut?![]()