2one2
Premiership Player
- May 30, 2012
- 3,569
- 5,429
- AFL Club
- Essendon
This is not the worst by a long shot. The article is well researched professional journalism reporting on facts and research tied in with a leading academics interpretation of these facts and the wider social ramifications of EFC's "whatever it takes" approach and consequences into the future. It ain't no opinion piece.
Six out of the eight information sources are individuals willing to put their name to this significant - and I think scary - phenomenon with direct experience and expertise working in the field from the supply side to the end user.
The article highlights how even kids are massively taking up the PEDS and vanity drugs. It is clear Hird, who lacks moral perception, and his enablers, the EFC , by their actions, are only exacerbating the consequences as outlined in this factual article. They are a disgrace until they do the right and moral thing and distance themselves totally from the people that allowed this to happen.. not to further reward them. What disgusting hubris, James Hird… bubble man, king of the heap.
This article demonstrates another reason why Hird should have stood aside as soon as the inquiry was called and the peptide program (and worse, e.g.:muscular dystrophy drugs) was blown open: people read between the lines and the perception is also he is getting away with it - plus the greater realisation he had history with Charters along with other well rewarded individuals such as Darcy, Woewoedin, etc… and stuff about Croad= Hawks? and Bock, etc.. But Hird is setting the example of non responsibility, acting shamelessly and keeps giving the finger to the AFL, the other 17 clubs and all their supporters.
Danny Jeffcote said the ''subtle message'' of these revelations was that if it is good enough for top athletes ''why should if be different for anyone else''.
I agree, but not so subtle, IMO.
Even in the remotest one in a thousand chance Hird did not know what was going on (I'm incredulous), he would still have to be condemned for overseeing what went wrong, gross mismanagement (lacking any records, supposedly) and he should bear responsibility for the perception which has hurt the game more than any other individual… just on the image consequences and perception basis, alone. For Hird and inc to give the finger, get the big pay while seeing the code brought low,
I think Hird and EFC has even tarnished the perception of other leading clubs such as: Geelong (links with Thompson, Dank?, Robinson?); the Hawks (with Croad connection, their desperation to win and remarkable back from injury stories); …. even the perception of the system of ethical medical oversight within the clubs has gone down the gurgler with Hird and the Dons.
After all, it went on for a nearly a year and they nearly got away with it and we now know the recently retired Cochoran (Hirds PA) was actively engaged very late in the piece in ensuring continuation of supply into 2014.
I really shouldn't engage but I think this is my favourite bit: Hird has tarnished the image of Geelong because Dank and Robinson were employed there and the Hawks because they had injection procedures in place before Essendon did. Haha okay mate. Gobble Gobble.




