ABC interview with Hird
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-17/james-hird/7094054
Still saying the players have done nothing wrong. Has he not read the judgment? CAS did not say they deliberately took illegal drugs. They didn't take the precautions to check like they have to do under the code
Also queries why Dank would provide illegal supplements. IIRC in that interview with Dank he says he gave them TB4, then when he's told it's banned he says that must have only been a recent decision, then he calls the journo later and says I didn't mean TB4 I meant thymosin
So maybe he didn't do it intentionally either. But the Panel says there was enough evidence that it happened anyway
Doesn't the ABC journalist think to put this stuff to Hird??
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-17/james-hird/7094054
Still saying the players have done nothing wrong. Has he not read the judgment? CAS did not say they deliberately took illegal drugs. They didn't take the precautions to check like they have to do under the code
Also queries why Dank would provide illegal supplements. IIRC in that interview with Dank he says he gave them TB4, then when he's told it's banned he says that must have only been a recent decision, then he calls the journo later and says I didn't mean TB4 I meant thymosin
So maybe he didn't do it intentionally either. But the Panel says there was enough evidence that it happened anyway
Doesn't the ABC journalist think to put this stuff to Hird??