Campo who was brought in as a depth player? Or Michael who has been fantastic in developing the kids such as Ryder. I woudl say having competent senoir players helping our them is the way to develop young players. Of course it's not an option with Richmond unfortunately.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Essendon team? wtf= tanking?
- Thread starter High Ryder
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Campo who was brought in as a depth player? Or Michael who has been fantastic in developing the kids such as Ryder. I woudl say having competent senoir players helping our them is the way to develop young players. Of course it's not an option with Richmond unfortunately.
haven't learnt the rules about trolling on another team's board?
I think a lesson needs to be learned... Merv? You should exercise your new-found powers and ban this whining bitch.
A tiger supporter spouting this crap. Oh the ironyHow many games have you won this year champ?
Sorted
Richmond supporters
not everyone is crap like your team. Culture of mediocrity Vs Culture of success.Easy
good work
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
yeah we sure do hang all our hopes on a player who hasnt played more then half of this year and a player who wouldnt have been in our top 12 players this year
you juts picked to players who we have no reliance on whatsoever,, you really know your footy
1 word: Tambling
They are in our best longy, you know that aswell. Campo and mj arent, they also arent contracted for next year and a small chance to be there. Have a feeling that Lucas, Lloyd, Fletcher and Michael will be.
Why houli and watson dont get a game is beyond me.
Hird trained well today and now a big chance to play
Looks like the board is now picking the team, can't wait until next year
Do you guys have to blame the board for everything? These are sheedy decisions and you know it.
Farrrk .. lets recruit Chad Liddell and Ezra Poyas then
They've proven they aren't up to AFL standard.
Campo was good when he was in the seniors, got injured and performed to earn his spot back.
Mark Johnson just about won us a game off his own boot, played a stinker, went to the VFL and did everything that was asked of him.
It's not like we're playing the likes of Bolton, these guys deserve their spot. We're a better side for having Campo in particular in the 22.
Farrrk .. lets recruit Chad Liddell and Ezra Poyas then
I think Macpie shows more reasoned opinoins about essendon than you do. How do you want to select our team then? WHy woudln't you take the guys who play bets in the 2nds? Just because someone is under 21 doesn't mean they shoudl get a game. At the moment Cmap and MJ will be of more sue to use than Houli 99% of the time. You are the guy who said play Lee despite his form so dont worry I'm not expecting a convincing or logical repsonse from you.
Campo and MJ are proven NON PERFORMERS on big grounds.
MJ has basically played stinkers all year with the odd goodish game.
Campo has had half a good game at the Dome and been irrelevant in other games.
You know there's a reason why we are bottom 4 AGAIN.
Maybe they are saving us from the spoon then?
I guess with your reasoned logic we should have selected Mark Bolton ahead of Reimers then.
Heck lets give Heff a game and drop Nash or Gumby or Monfries or Lovett or Slatts or .....
Unless we lose all three games we won't be bottom four.
Campo runs the corridor, he actually forces us to go straighter.
He's played one game at the G and we won it.
Hawthorn game aside, I don't think Mark Johnson has been that bad and I do hope he's played forward.
I guess with your reasoned logic we should have selected Mark Bolton ahead of Reimers then.
Heck lets give Heff a game and drop Nash or Gumby or Monfries or Lovett or Slatts or .....
Heff has been poor at VFL level, Campo and MJ haven't.
You're bad at this.
A special thanks goes out to Jobe Watson for his game that night.
I guess with your reasoned logic we should have selected Mark Bolton ahead of Reimers then.
Heck lets give Heff a game and drop Nash or Gumby or Monfries or Lovett or Slatts or .....
Bolton hasn't been killing VFL so irrelevant point. Why was playing Reimers accepted as teh right move? He got 6 or 7 touches and we got belted, maybe if we had played someone else they may have had mroe impact adn we coudl've won. Then we wouldn't have had to put up with you whinging about "ohhhwe aren't a bottom 4 side, but i still want to tank"
Haha you really battle with winnign an argument on its merits dont you. You're changing your point. I'm saying Campo and MJ played better in the VFL than Houli. Do you dispute that? Houli also played better than Heff. So Houli would be ahead of Heff yet behind Campo and MJ. If Heff was dominating in the VFL to the same degree as Campo and MJ did, and there was a spot for him because someone was not performing well enough, then yes play Heff. Try to use sense rather than hyperbole next time champ.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Heff has not been poor at VFL level. He's been one of the best in the past few weeks. He's one of the few that look like the can play at AFL level.
Campo has barely laid a tackle at VFL level and hasn't been very accountable. Cheap possi king.
MJ had one good game at VFL after a shocking year in the seniors. He's surplus to requirements and should retire or told to retire.
Your good at making pointless arguments
Do you see a spot for Campo and MJ in the side next year?
Your good at changing your mind to suit your argument at any point in time especially after the fact.
No mention of Campo and MJ in this post:
Time to get p**ssed and wallow in another year or sub standard rubbish.
I'm convinced you either know little about footy or haven't seen anything of Bendigo and you're making your judgement based on the "attempt at increasing trade value column" otherwise known as "VFL best players."
Haven't changed my tune at all.
Hird and Hocking happened, and Hille went out instead of Laycock.
I made the presumption Peverill would be safe and didn't expect him to be dropped, but don't have a problem with him being omitted. Watson has obviously been dropped for reasons other than form so again he wasn't rated a mention at the time.
With those two out, I'd pick two of Campo, MJ or JJ. With JJ not playing last week, that leaves two options.
MJ yes, Campo no.
Do I think Campo's inclusion can benefit Reimers, Hocking and co? Yes.
Will MJ be in the best 22 next year?
monty1104
Brownlow Medallist
So does that mean we should only have 22 players on out list and pray that we dont get injuries? We have a list of 40 odd. Only 22 can be in our starting lineup. Campo wont be alone not being in out best 22.
We all know he really loves Essendon. He posts more about the dons then the pies!
