Pretty sure he is mate.That would work if Gumbleton was a Free Agent
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Pretty sure he is mate.That would work if Gumbleton was a Free Agent
Pretty sure he is mate.
Fair enough,could've sworn he was restricted,anyway i stand corrected.http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-05-21/where-your-clubs-free-agents-are-at
FA next season. Not this one
Those players had shown next to nothing at their previous clubs before being traded for, they were traded for because they were relatively young and could fill a hole. Mumford was a 2-3 season wonder and Maric a 1 season wonder. Brodie Grundy hasn't even played a senior game yet.
Bellchambers is 22-23 and has already shown that he is an established ruckman who would be a number 1 ruckman at the majority of other clubs. Essendon just have the luxury of having an abundance of quality talls.
Essendon would laugh at anything less than a top 12 pick and even then they would be reluctant.
Can't see Bellchambers being traded in any case but just thought i'd try and make a point about his value.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Bellchambers and one of Hooker or Crameri to GWS for pick #1
Even all three for pick #1 if needed to get the trade done.
Essendon has a problem. We have too many talented talls to fit in our side. Pretend for a moment you're an opposition recruiter, and you need someone, what would you be interested in offering Essendon for any or all of the their tall players.
This is a thought experiment only, none of them are on offer that I know of. In keeping with that, ignore the peptide thing, which might be a factor in real-world calculations but in this instance we're talking purely football ability. I've omitted Hille and Fletcher for the sake of the exercise.
Michael Hurley, Patrick Ryder, Tom Bellchambers, Joe Daniher, Jake Carlisle, Cale Hooker, Tayte Pears, Scott Gumbleton
Im going to try an be realistic and offer this as a Fair trade.
Freo need an experienced Key defender to Replace Luke Mcpharlin after 2014. Depending where Freo finish. 1st round pick would be between pick 13-16.
Haduken, I would have interest in Tayte Pears and Cale hooker. Would you be happy if freo gave you pick 13 for one of those guys?
With Fletch being a strong chance of retiring, neither Pears or Hook would be up for trade. Pears should slot straight in next season.
One of Crameri or Gumby will go IMO, most probably Gumby. Job security would be slim on both accounts. Daniher I'd imagine coming off a strong preseason will be pairing up with one of Hurley/Carlisle and the resting ruckman up forward. Not enough room for them all.
I beg to differ. Pears, Bellchambers and Gumbleton are the ones likely to leave. Hurley and Carlisle are both key defenders, and Hooker as the third tall defender.
Would take pick 13 in a heartbeat for Pears
Not sure if serious, if so, surely you have had too many cones for the evening.
You wouldn't even except that if you were held at gun pointI would have thought that Bellchambers alone would be enough for pick 1. Depending on how desperate GWS is for a ruckman.
Would take pick 13 for Tayte Pears in a heartbeat. Will come down to what happens with Gumby and T-Bell. We can't afford to lose more than one.
Pick 13 for Pears what have you been smokingI wouldnt mind either one, Do you rate Cale hooker very highly at your team?
Pick 13 for Pears what have you been smoking
I wouldnt mind either one, Do you rate Cale hooker very highly at your team?
I'd have a look at Hooker but Pears looks terrible at times.Yeah, he's the #1 intercept mark in the AFL and we're one of the best sides in terms of scores from turnovers so he's pretty important both defensively and offensively
I'd have a look at Hooker but Pears looks terrible at times.
What would Hooker be worth in your eyes?Pears just needs confidence. But I'm also of the view that Essendon's best key defensive combo is Hooker, Hurley and Carlisle so I can't really find a place for him
What would Hooker be worth in your eyes?
We haven't really got the players you want Lamb could be a possibility but he's hasn't had enough games to be worth anything and we don't really have a spare line breaking mid so maybe it would have to be our first pick which I am comfortable with.It would have to be a good deal, because he's much improved on last season and we got offered picks 25 and 26 for him then. There are 2 clear deficiencies in our side: the Angus Monfries type small forward, lead-up with good hands and good kick for goal and another line-breaking mid.
We haven't really got the players you want Lamb could be a possibility but he's hasn't had enough games to be worth anything and we don't really have a spare line breaking mid so maybe it would have to be our first pick which I am comfortable with.