Remove this Banner Ad

Science/Environment Explaining evolution and natural selection.

  • Thread starter Thread starter M Malice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

:rolleyes: species changing over time is fact. the explanation for how/why this happens, is always open for revision and improvement.
Hence the term "theory of evolution"....
Like all things science it is ever changing, updated to take into account the new evidence and the new facts, tested at every turn by every new scientist in the feild.

Totally unlike scripture, some blokes imaginings written down thousands of years ago and never questioned.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

https://www.wired.com/2016/09/gorge...action/?mbid=psocial_cnnmoney&linkId=28843381

THIS TIME-LAPSE IS one of the most compelling—and unsettling—visualizations of evolution we’ve ever seen. The overhead footage depicts a strain of the gut bacterium E. coli evolving to be 1,000 times more resistant to an antibiotic in a matter of 11 days, starkly visualizing the speed with which diseases can adapt to the drugs we throw their way.

Just amazing! but yeah we have no proof at all of evolution happening! LoL
 
Wow. Ok. They are lots of kids books On evolution out there using little words.

Facts. Industries like, medical science, agriculture, animal husbandry, DNA and pest control all are based concretely in Evolution. If you want to claim evolution is not a thing explain why in works so well.

Small children often don't understand how evolution works. There are these little fish that live in streams. People believed that there was 3 different types of fish. DNA shows they are the same fish. A bright coloured one, a sand coloured one and a pebble coloured one.

Get a bunch of sand and/or peddle coloured fish and put them in a fish tank with no predators. The females will select mates which effects reproduction and in 2 years you will have a tank full so colourful fish.

Now change the bottom of the tank to peddles and put a predator in and in 2 years you'll have peddle coloured fish. The predator eating them effects reproduction.

Change the bottom to sand and the coloured of the fish change.
Take the predator out and they go back to colourful.
Again the predator effects the reproduction.

The fish are changing because of the environment they live in.
That's how it works.


On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
agree paul180 my first set of videos i posted in the OP were intended to be understandable by children which they are IMO.

if you have don't believe in evolution via natural selection, i give up, it is as certain as the sun coming up in the morning, gravity or my eventual demise.
 
O Ye of little faith...

View attachment 290366
Built using only contemporary materials and techniques.
You realise that is a building, on land, on concrete foundations not a ship/boat/ark and that it would disintegrate even before it had a chance to sink.


Or maybe you don't.


Ark-exterior-1-e1453936399141.jpg
 

Remove this Banner Ad

You realise that is a building, on land, on concrete foundations not a ship/boat/ark and that it would disintegrate even before it had a chance to sink.

No.

I am blind and have an acquired brain injury after a wooden beam fell on my head whilst I was building an ark.
 
No.

I am blind and have an acquired brain injury after a wooden beam fell on my head whilst I was building an ark.
Some people seem inclined to miss those salient points. Not you specifically, but the easily led.
 
The big killer of "Ark" theory" is even if they could gather two of every animal, and even if they could fit them on the Ark, even if they had the additional "100 x ark capacity" to store the food required or the "150 x arc capacity" to store the water required to just barely keep the animal alive, even if they could keep the inside temperature down low enough the animals did not die from heat exhaustion before they all expired from the toxic atmosphere of methane, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide their is the question of disease.
All the known diseases had to be on board too.
Then there is Kuru.

One of Noah's sons would have had to have built a sea going boat, discovered New Guinea, sailed there killed a Papuan and eaten his brain in order to infect himself with the Kuru. Kuru can only exist by passed from one human to another by way of the consumption of the infected brain.
He then had to sail back to the Ark's alleged location and before or at the time he inevitably died from the always fatal disease Noah or some such must have organised another human to consume his brain in order to keep the disease extant post flood.

God knows who could have possibly let Noah know where to find Papua?
 
Sure But have you had brains is a beautiful hollandaise sauce?

When the Noah's ark movie was around and people were pointing out that you couldn't fit all the animals in the was a crazy christian explaining that
1) they only took the baby animals
2) Your reading the measures wrong, that's not the length but the radius. The ark was round. Just like all great ocean going ships.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The whole upper level was devoted to growing watermelons and bananas and shit.

Hope they've got hydroponics, not alot of melons & bananas to be had over 40 days.

Will it be tall enough for the giraffes you think?.

Window seats will be at a premium you'd a thought.
 
You realise that is a building, on land, on concrete foundations not a ship/boat/ark and that it would disintegrate even before it had a chance to sink.


Or maybe you don't.


Ark-exterior-1-e1453936399141.jpg
I like how he is putting insulation paper on the outside. We can't have the Komodo Dragons catching a chill.
 
I'll give ya a hint...

;)
I never realised Don Jorge de Meneses was so old!!
He must have been the one who put all those silly Catholic ideas in Noah's head and taught his son to sail.
He did not find Papua until 1527 though so that rules his telling Noah out.

Any ideas on who ate Noah's sons brain then sailed back to New Guinea to be eaten by the by now non-existent Papuans?
Or were these heathens some how spared the flood?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom