Never said you abused Andrew so that is another lie from you once again.The difference is. I watched the entire clip, and responded to what was in it.
That's why Retts told me to ignore Avi...
On the other hand, Andrew refused to read the article, because it was from the Guardian.
And you've just made up that I abused him for it.
Let's see if you can engage.
Why did Avi repeatedly claim there were 200 arsonists? A lie on top of a lie.
Why did he blame the Greens for the fires, after it's been clearly pointed out as false.
Why did he keep referring to the hardship of the police, but when they asked him and his security detail to help them out and just move on, he wants to debate what laws he is breaking?
I don't expect you to answer these questions, because you can't engage.