Who should they bill? Who is the "Milo" in this scenario?
Here in Melbourne the Police policy seems to be if you charge to go in, you can pay, if you force your opinion on people, no charge.
Can see some committee believing thats fair.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who should they bill? Who is the "Milo" in this scenario?
Who should they bill? Who is the "Milo" in this scenario?
No, it's your scenario:It's you're scenario, you tell me.
Vic Police should be billing the organizers of the Extinction Rebellion for the costs involved in Policing 7 days worth of "protesting", as they should have billed the Antifa "protestors" at Milo's Melb show.
So will the Extinction Rebellion organizers be footing the bill for 7 days worth of Police resources used on them or are they exempt because they are a religious organization? Apparently Vic Police have already billed Milo Yiannopoulos for the Melbourne protests, just wondering who's going to be out of pocket for the other Australian cities?
No, it's your scenario:
But you have clarified saying they should have billed the organisers.
What is the legal entity here? Where can they send the bill? Who are the organisers?
You're eliding support for protesters and support for the idea that action is needed, type of action, extent of action, and so on.25% of the country supports the protesters at most. That’s probably being overly generous. A BigFooty poll is not an accurate reflection of Australian views.
So you don't actually think the organisers should be billed?
You've lost me. What were you being sarcastic about?
What is sarcastic about that?"Apparently Vic Police have already billed Milo Yiannopoulos for the Melbourne (Extinction Rebellion) protests"
What is sarcastic about that?
They have billed him:
Milo Yiannopoulos and tour organisers yet to pay $50k bill for extra police at show
Hundreds of left and right-wing protesters clashed outside the Melbourne Pavilion in Kensington in December at the Yiannopoulos event.www.theage.com.au
Has he paid? Or is he just a societal leech?
So your argument is:
- Milo shouldn't have been billed.
- But he was billed (though he hasn't paid from what I can see)
- Milo was billed.
- XR should be billed.
- But nobody should be billed.
OK, we got there.This is getting tiresome.
1. Antifa should have been billed for disrupting Milo's event.
2. XR should be billed for their week long protests.
That's what I believe should have happened.
You go looking for that stuff??
OK, we got there.
Who is "antifa"? Where would the bill be sent?
Who is "XR"? Where would the bill be sent?
It follows, I assume, that you think Alan Jones should have been billed for the cost of policing the Cronulla riots?
No, it's your scenario:
But you have clarified saying they should have billed the organisers.
What is the legal entity here? Where can they send the bill? Who are the organisers?
Something like a fine, you reckon?
We had christians banging on about dooms day, burning witches and starting wars with those that disagreed with them
we had the dooms day call with the Maya calendar
dooms day with Y2K, AIDS and the cold war
dooms day with Waco Texas
Rasputin's call of doomsday
but this time they are right