Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've said that I'm Soft Downhill Skier .
Why don't you admit to the names of your other accounts?
Liar...
XR contemplating suing that police dept who released that dopey extremist guide. Good for them.
Yeah, you're not lyingUmmmm maybe because I don’t have any?
Do you realise you were just caught liking and responding to your own posts?
Yeah, you're not lying
And you got me!
So now... do you want to reply to the thread topic?
Let's see if you can engage.Which part specifically?
Let's see if you can engage.
Why did Avi repeatedly claim there were 200 arsonists? A lie on top of a lie.
Why did he blame the Greens for the fires, after it's been clearly pointed out as false.
Why did he keep referring to the hardship of the police, but when they asked him and his security detail to help them out and just move on, he wants to debate what laws he is breaking?
I bet you will though...I’m not going to comment on the claims of 200 arsonists,
You've definitely taken the same approach as you do with most things... You've ignored the evidence, you've ignored the clarification and outrage that the lies you support have caused. You've ignored the now common understanding of the deliberate deception pushed by the elites that it was arson.I’m not going to comment on the claims of 200 arsonists, other than to say, I have heard that claim from more people than just Avi, and I’ll take the same approach I take with a lot of the climate change debate - I don’t profess to know what the truth is, so I’m not going to come down on one side or the other. Do you dispute arson is involved?
What meaningless verbiage.As for him ‘blaming’ the Greens, I think far too many are blaming the Greens/hazard reduction exclusively. But are the Greens partially responsible for making matters worse? Almost certainly.
I bet you will...Avi shouldn’t of gone on Friday, but he couldn’t help himself.
I won’t defend him on that.
I bet you will though...
You've definitely taken the same approach as you do with most things... You've ignored the evidence, you've ignored the clarification and outrage that the lies you support have caused. You've ignored the now common understanding of the deliberate deception pushed by the elites that it was arson.
You've claimed knowledge on a situation you've demonstrated you don't know anything about...
What meaningless verbiage.
You've once again ignored all the evidence, and claimed it's the Greens. While pretending that you're open minded...
I bet you will...
He went because that's when the protest was.
He went with a huge security detail.
He made a massive point of how unfair it is on the police, while deliberately making their job harder because he had double checked with his lawyer on what he could get away with.
He lied to extend the known lie about the number of arsonists.
He lied about the impact the Greens had.
He embarrassed himself repeatedly.
And you posted his video...
Now you're pretending you don't support him.
Please respond to the questions you've caused.I loathe the modern woke left and identity politics.
Doesn’t mean I support Avi.
Just to clarify....
Are you suggesting that none of the fires have been deliberately lit? Absolutely no role for arson in any of this?
And huge security detail? Get your hand off it.
Please respond to the questions you've caused.
Stop running away.
Don't be a troll. Be honest about your beliefs...
What account was that?Yeah ok, I preferred it when you had me on ignore.
Let’s go back to that.
If you're talking about me, I'm not engaging you in discussion any more.Yeah ok, I preferred it when you had me on ignore.
Let’s go back to that.
run away dude.. before you get hysterically started...Which part specifically?
Haha - Yemeni got water thrown over him? Classic.
Remember when totally non-PC comedian Jim Jeffries owned him in that interview and Avi went ballistic? Good times and a win for not only the non-PC progressive Jeffries but all good people tired of the politically correct Avi Yemenis of the world.
And I'll reiterate the point that you keep supporting...
"There is a reason you need to troll, rather than engage in debate.When you troll, you can hide your bigotry, and be supported by hidden bigots.But when you engage, you display your bigotry, and hidden bigots 'overlook' you. "
That was a very ugly example of editing, not to mention when the network phoned the FBI as Yemeni was flying into the US because they were scared of him.
It happens on tv all the time, so never ever give an interview, but if there was a creative editing to deliberately misrepresent someone in a position to do something about it then we might find some enforced honesty in the matter.
No matter what someone's persuasion, they don't deserve to be deliberately misrepresented by another entity for that entity's benefit. There will be a lot of news groups slaughtered in the courts if that were law.
I'll tell you again. CM86 is taking the piss. I don't interact with you on this site.This is all a bit rich coming from a bloke who has just got caught using a sock puppet alias account to like and reply to posts from this account. Or is it the other way around?
I'll tell you again. CM86 is taking the piss. I don't interact with you on this site.
Listen, he's taking the piss. Speak to the mods if you want. I don't want to get in a back and forth.Stop playing games.
im sure youd know afterall you regularly troll threads.There is a reason you need to troll, rather than engage in debate.
fu** me youre a hypocrite. one minute youre abusing posters like Andrew Birch for rejecting articles you post for being utter trash and lying and yet here you are doing the same thing.
maybe its because really you cant engage?
The difference is. I watched the entire clip, and responded to what was in it.
That's why Retts told me to ignore Avi...
On the other hand, Andrew refused to read the article, because it was from the Guardian.
And you've just made up that I abused him for it.
Let's see if you can engage.
Why did Avi repeatedly claim there were 200 arsonists? A lie on top of a lie.
Why did he blame the Greens for the fires, after it's been clearly pointed out as false.
Why did he keep referring to the hardship of the police, but when they asked him and his security detail to help them out and just move on, he wants to debate what laws he is breaking?
I don't expect you to answer these questions, because you can't engage.
It probably is because I have only seen the alert now you utterly dumb flog."I don't expect you to answer these questions, because you can't engage."
What a surprise, you didn't respond to that...