Magma
TheBrownDog
sounds like it is actually happening and he'll partner leclerc for 2025. insane
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The Andretti stuff is ridiculous. I can understand teams wanting to protect their interests, but they have to realise this damages the sport as a whole.One Italian journo seems to think it has a high likely hood of happening and said he wouldn't be surprised if the contract is already signed.
As some on r/forumla1 have stated, the timing is fishy and could very well be a directive of FOM to take away the spotlight from the Andretti rejection.
I also wonder if this puts Sainz in the conversation for the potentially available Red Bull #2 seat. He has a history there, and has been a teammate of Max before. He has been okay at Ferrari, been screwed a bit by reliability and general ineptness on the pit wall at times.I think Albon gets it. If Lando hadn't have signed this new deal they would have had a real big crack at him.
Perez maybe, if he loses his seat.I'd say Albon to Mercedes. Sainz to Audi. Don't know who replaces Albon though
Sent from my motorola edge 30 pro using Tapatalk
Squib move?Hamilton going to Ferrari is another squib move. The cushiest life in motorsport anyone's ever had and after a couple of years not in the best car, is going to go to a rival team. Let's hope he goes there with a hattrick of seasons without a win.
Kinda see Perez retiring if he loses the RB seat.Perez maybe, if he loses his seat.
Lawson into the vacant AT seat if Daniel or Yuki are promoted to RBR.
Squib move?
All time great driver wants to put himself in the best seat possible, as all drivers do.
I don't really understand this from Ferrari.
Sainz is a good driver. One who can win races with the right car.
Hamilton is not an upgrade..and even if he was, it's not going to be the difference between them winning and losing.
Hamilton's got a proven record. Sainz is alright, a decent driver, but not exceptional, and not looking likely to be exceptional.I don't really understand this from Ferrari.
Sainz is a good driver. One who can win races with the right car.
Hamilton is not an upgrade..and even if he was, it's not going to be the difference between them winning and losing.
He would be thanks to Mercedes not being a manufacturer for 55 yearsIs he the first driver to drive for Ferrari, Mercedes and McLaren?
I want to say I am blindsided by this move but you could argue this was coming. Merc simply made the wrong choice with their no sidepods two seasons ago and are still paying the price. It was a gamble that did not pay off.