They are asking the wrong person , you have to ask the 3 yr old daughter to get answers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This. Plus the club knew on Saturday, and so did the playersCan we please note use the Sloanes' recent tragedy to excuse Fagan's arrogance and contempt for supporters. It's kind of distasteful.
I don’t like that he is finally going to speak on the day that Rory and Belinda advise of their heartbreaking news.
Or is that just me?
On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app
Mackay on holidays?Wash your own car
He reminds me of someone...
It has been a hell of a week regarding SA news. Fagan is allowed to be in grief mode, and behave irritatably towards the journos. I would bet he already made some sort of comments prior to what we saw of the news footage. I can imagine he said something like “no further comments on McGovern until we evaluate all available options.” Journos being journos, likely had kept on pestering him to get a reaction to stick it on the news!Can we please note use the Sloanes' recent tragedy to excuse Fagan's arrogance and contempt for supporters. It's kind of distasteful.
I'd say get Shaun Rehn to do it, but then people would say it is a 'boys club' appointment, despite the fact he has the required experience.Wash your own car
He should have let them get run over.Did I miss something with the car comment?
He was just saying to the reporters and camera men to watch the car that was driving towards them with their backs to it. What was the problem there?
What I got from that is that he wasn't worried about the reporters or camera men getting hit, though, he was more concerned they might damage the car. His behaviour in this clip does come across as arrogant. It looks like he can't believe they have the cheek to be there, let alone question him.Did I miss something with the car comment?
He was just saying to the reporters and camera men to watch the car that was driving towards them with their backs to it. What was the problem there?
Nup - he was amazed that they were backing into the car that was coming towards them imo.What I got from that is that he wasn't worried about the reporters or camera men getting hit, though, he was more concerned they might damage the car. His behaviour in this clip does come across as arrogant. It looks like he can't believe they have the cheek to be there, let alone question him.
Then "Watch out for the car!" Is what you'd say.Nup - he was amazed that they were backing into the car that was coming towards them imo.
Look Fagan could've handled that better, but did that journo not read the recent news and club statements herself? "Will Mitch be staying here next here?" WTF?
What's was going to be her next question? "Are the Crows playing finals this year? Did the team win against Carlton?"
Well it wasn't approaching at 100 miles an hour! What do you think he was saying it for? Like a "Don't touch my car" vibe?Then "Watch out for the car!" Is what you'd say.
You don't say please when alerting people to danger.
I don't know, it's not important.Well it wasn't approaching at 100 miles an hour! What do you think he was saying it for? Like a "Don't touch my car" vibe?
It didn't hit them.Did I miss something with the car comment?
He was just saying to the reporters and camera men to watch the car that was driving towards them with their backs to it. What was the problem there?
i think that was the vibe that made it gain tractionWell it wasn't approaching at 100 miles an hour! What do you think he was saying it for? Like a "Don't touch my car" vibe?