lol, and yet the PS3 is consistantly outperformed by the 360?!?
They had a year to fix up Bioshock, and it still comes out worse on the PS3.
Since when has the 360 outperformed the PS3? Part of performance is reliability, and 75% of 360's fail.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

lol, and yet the PS3 is consistantly outperformed by the 360?!?
They had a year to fix up Bioshock, and it still comes out worse on the PS3.
Haha, surely while typing that you realised it made absolutely no sense.
Even if games were dumbed down for the 360, which is sounds a bit fanciful, this doesn't explain why they still look worse on the apparently unbelievably powerful ps3.
Why isnt the PS3 version made to the quality of PC version if its capable of such amazing things? The quality of the apparently inferior 360 version of games is irrelevant.
Or is it that 3rd party producers can't be arsed muching around getting things to work on the complicated ps3 seeing as it accounts for such a small percentage of sales.
Since when has the 360 outperformed the PS3.
Sales and quality of cross platform games is a starting point it seems
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
If you try and play an old school DOS game on a modern PC, without using an emulator, the game runs terribly because the PC is TOO powerful to run it the wya its intended.
Much the same principle.
Sales are not particularly in favour of the 360. Certianly not enough to claim any kind of victory or even edge, not to mention sales are completely irrelevant to most people..
Its several million ahead.
You asked for an example of where the 360 had outperformed the ps3. Sales is one.
The quality of the game being questioned here is another.
There's many more examples
Since when has the 360 outperformed the PS3?
This was your question
It was answered
![]()
Shit...just realised this is the fallout thread. Apologies in advance for another nerdlinger console debate encroaching on it
In other words: you lose again.

Sales are not particularly in favour of the 360. Certianly not enough to claim any kind of victory or even edge, not to mention sales are completely irrelevant to most people.
Many cross platform games are better on PS3 - GTA4 for example.
Not to mention, every single one of the 360's best games is available in a better format. What is, honestly, the point of buying a 360? I bought one well over a year ago and have no idea why.
FFS guys, who cares what ****ing console you use. Both are good, just let this pathetic fan boy shit go already.
I open a thread to read up on a game and find you moron's wanking off at each other, seriously, give it a ****ing rest.
Sales are not particularly in favour of the 360. Certianly not enough to claim any kind of victory or even edge, not to mention sales are completely irrelevant to most people.
Many cross platform games are better on PS3 - GTA4 for example.
Not to mention, every single one of the 360's best games is available in a better format. What is, honestly, the point of buying a 360? I bought one well over a year ago and have no idea why.
LLD stated that the 360 outperforms the PS3 all the time though, in every facet.
Reliability is one area the 360 loses, by a long way.
Quality of exclusives, another.
number of exclusives, another..
Price, another..
the PS3 ticks all the right boxes.
Sales are not particularly in favour of the 360. Certianly not enough to claim any kind of victory or even edge, not to mention sales are completely irrelevant to most people.
And the Wii shits over both consoles, so does that really mean that the Wii>PS3 and 360?I am pretty sure that game developers find sales very relevant. It is after all a business. If they choose not to make a game because they will not make a good enough profit then it is relevant to gamers like us as well.
The point is as the 360 continually pulls further and further in front it becomes easier for microsoft to say to a developer look you make the game exclusively for Xbox and we will give you the $200,000 in revenue that you would get for making it for PS3 as well. It is already obvious in the lack of quality games that the PS3 has, and their inability to secure their #1 exclusive Final Fantasy.
And the Wii shits over both consoles, so does that really mean that the Wii>PS3 and 360?
And the Wii shits over both consoles, so does that really mean that the Wii>PS3 and 360?
I wasnt talking about which one was better I was just pointing out some economic facts about the relevance of sales to our friend Karl.