I really don't keep a mental track of peoples posting history when I'm in a discussion. I didn't think you were being an arsehole until you threw in the wink emoji and referenced my join date.Oh dude, you are overeacting. You said it yourself right at the start "I haven't been around long enough to understand".
So I explained how the Casey Voss thing has literally been a thing here since he was a toddler which you then said wasn't your observation.
So then I simply invoke YOUR OWN disclaimer to say "yeah, it was indeed before your time" and then suddenly you claim you are being put down and that I am asserting my superiority... for saying the same thing as you. That's not you "engaging", it's escalating.
Sorry man, but in this case, any idea of "being put in your place" exists in your head. That is not what has happened here at all. Like I said, it was a throwaway line referencing a potential ironic situation on the horizon, and you've (admittedly unintentially) made a mountain out of a molehill. You've obviously got a preexisting opinion of me and it shaded your judgement in this case. iBeng and Scubaveg clearly saw it in the right light.
Try rereading it without the assumption I am being an arsehole and see if it comes off in a better light, because I genuinely wasn't.
Let's move on from exhausting ourselves over something that really could have ended at post #486
Ok, so I wasn't around in 2001 to read people posting about their hopes and dreams for toddler Casey Voss.
Instead of referencing my join date and tell me i'm pulling at to many threads for a throw away line, explain in a little more detail it was a throw away line and that there was a lots of posts about Casey Voss before 2015. Because anyone reading these threads since 2013 would have little idea that there were hopes and dreams for Casey from members here prior to last year.
I was playing nice and had no preexisting idea of where the conversation would go before post #498.
Happy to leave this conversation here now.