Racing February Daily Thread: Mark McGowan stops the spread of Pike backing

Australian Guineas Winner?

  • 6. LUNAR FOX(6)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 9. BELTORO(3)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 10. EMBOLISM(14)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 13. CAMBOURNE(9)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 14. IRONEDGE(5)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 15. HERE TO SHOCK(4)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 17e.LOFTY STAR(13)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Rippin Memphis in the next at Cannington $2.70
Flawless beginner, straight to the lead and should be able to hold on all the way
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Yikes

HE doesnt deserve it with the numbers he has taken. He will be one of these forever to be unlucky not to mention he must have done his absolute balls spending 200 on a small percantage quaddy over the years.
He would be one of those guys who comes up to you and said wow the favourite won and i had the 50/1 second horse after every ferken race.
 
HE doesnt deserve it with the numbers he has taken. He will be one of these forever to be unlucky not to mention he must have done his absolute balls spending 200 on a small percantage quaddy over the years.
He would be one of those guys who comes up to you and said wow the favourite won and i had the 50/1 second horse after every ferken race.
Everyone gets their kicks differently. Some have no interest in trying to turn 200 into 300 and would prefer a high variance
 
Everyone gets their kicks differently. Some have no interest in trying to turn 200 into 300 and would prefer a high variance
Good on him for boosting quaddie pools but he would get better kicks pushing buttons on the pokies. I cop these idiots telling me their stupid boring non stories all the bloody time. I generally say something like. i got my own problems thanks. Pests!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Good on him for boosting quaddie pools but he would get better kicks pushing buttons on the pokies. I cop these idiots telling me their stupid boring non stories all the bloody time. I generally say something like. i got my own problems thanks. Pests!

Yeah it just seems a terrible way to bet. The guy who won makes more sense if you are going to play that way. He has taken a set against the fave in the first and put in the 2nd and 3rd fave, then field field, then the fave in the last (though I guess may not have been when he put it on). At least you have a better hope in the second example and a s**t load better dividend if you do hit it.
 
Back
Top