Jordon Peterson nails it as usual:
Interesting bloke. Hadn't come across him before.
That bloke next to him is so swigging booze out of that thermos.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jordon Peterson nails it as usual:
How many women would date a guy that earns significantly less than them? It seems that is a much greater rarity than the opposite happening.
Did he ever feel emasculated? Was he expected to still pay for the majority of dinners?I don't have a number but I did date a guy who earned a lot less than I did for seven years. It just wasn't an issue.
Did he ever feel emasculated? Was he expected to still pay for the majority of dinners?
They're genuine questions, what you said has intrigued me.
I don't have a number but I did date a guy who earned a lot less than I did for seven years. It just wasn't an issue.
Of course personal anecdotes are powerful, but I can't see that is the case in the majority of actual relationships.
You will find that families do what they need to do. I know at least three men that are or have been house husbands. Probably more if I think about it.
International Woman's Day was interesting. Some women around really got involved, while the men thought it was a load of crap, when will there be an International Men's Day?
Personally good on the women if you want a day go for it but I don't really care one way or another. Like Valentines Day.
There will never be a Men's Day as I don't think men really have that mindset or gravitate together the same way women do tbh. If you had a Men's Day tomorrow I and most men would just roll their eyes.
Turns out there actually is a Men's day - November 19th from memory. I'd never heard of it until the past few days.
A lot of the press that it gets is about how we shouldn't need one because apparently 364/365 days of the year are for us.
Or shite like this:
http://www.sbs.com.au/comedy/article/2016/03/07/things-we-could-celebrate-international-mens-day
International men's day is as embarrasing as the women's day.A lot of the press that it gets is about how we shouldn't need one because apparently 364/365 days of the year are for us.
Or shite like this:
http://www.sbs.com.au/comedy/article/2016/03/07/things-we-could-celebrate-international-mens-day
International men's day is as embarrasing as the women's day.
It doesn't really bother me either, but I like it when people rag on it because it's stupid.I don't mind the concepts (as far as I care about any so-called international day), but all the point scoring and nonsense that surrounds them is definitely embarrassing.
That's all well and good, but who wore the pants?a good friend of mine, his partner makes double his salary. Doesn't seem a bit deal to them.
Cricket Australia is offering female cricketers vastly lower pay, travel and work conditions than those available to their male counterparts, forcing the professional sportswomen to fight for the same rights as male players.
A new collective players’ agreement is currently under negotiation, and while it is set to include women for the first time, discussions are all but stalled in the battle for gender equality.
The game’s governing body, Cricket Australia, and the Australian Cricketers Association, which represents 300 players – including 120 women - are currently at loggerheads in a last ditch attempt to draw up a new Memorandum of Understanding before a deadline of June 30.
While this is the first time female players’ conditions will be covered by the historically male-only MOU, a critical sticking point is the significant gap between what is on offer for the different sexes. This is also the first time females have been represented by the ACA, and the first time their rights have been championed as a collective – something that has been happening for male players for decades.
http://www.whimn.com.au/talk/news/e...e/news-story/ba6d1d5ad16b57c914757742aa6755f9
You have. I want. Repeat.
Surely this has to be a parody. Nobody is as stupid as this author are they?
I seem to recall reading that most men with prostate cancer die from something else - will have to see if I can track it down.* I've always wondered at this, but a little while ago I read a good argument that somewhat justifies the discrepancy - breast cancer tends to kill women younger (often with small children) than prostate cancer kills men. I still think there is an imbalance, but I can see merit in that argument.