Social Justice Theory: A Solution in Search of a Problem
David Rose, Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri-St. Louis.
http://www.libertylawsite.org/liberty-forum/social-justice-theory-a-solution-in-search-of-a-problem/
"What social justice theory is really about is equality, but that just begs the question: what, precisely, is so bad about unequal outcomes? I shall now argue that social justice advocates have an answer for this, but they don't know what it really is and therefore cannot understand why it's wrong.
Social justice advocates view inequality of outcomes as sufficient evidence of injustice because they have a very narrow and foolish view of equality that we all naturally find plausible because of our small group moral sensibilities and our hardwired proclivity to be envious. In short, social justice theory implicitly focuses on the equal division of output without accounting for input.
Social justice theory therefore effectively considers only half of the relevant story when making judgements about what is fair and therefore just across the whole of any society. But surely I must be missing something, otherwise how could social justice theory be so popular?
I submit that it is so popular because in reality all that social justice theory does is codify small group moral sensibilities that come naturally to us by virtue of being a small group species."
Btw, feminism-related threads on SRP have covered many, if not all, of your points with posts, articles, studies and/or videos.