Society/Culture Feminism

kfc1

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 27, 2010
Posts
11,089
Likes
9,938
AFL Club
Essendon
Romeowho and cartwright, Both of you are a bit dopey and/or havent listened to the video properly. She said there is a difference in average earnings, which is what the data in Australia shows as we discussed only a day or two ago. The data does not show that women are being paid 75 cents in the dollar for the same work, which is the myth she was dispelling. The data in the US and Australia does not show any gap in pay for the same work based on gender.

Being unable to comprehend let alone refute her points you then resort to an insult based on an unrelated sensationalist book title - a book which you have not read.

Also why is the US data unsubstantiated? Have you looked at the source data? Bet you cant even tell me what the source data is.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

CM86

Anindilyakwa
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Posts
8,817
Likes
7,223
AFL Club
St Kilda
Romeowho and cartwright, Both of you are a bit dopey and/or havent listened to the video properly. She said there is a difference in average earnings, which is what the data in Australia shows as we discussed only a day or two ago. The data does not show that women are being paid 75 cents in the dollar for the same work, which is the myth she was dispelling. The data in the US and Australia does not show any gap in pay for the same work based on gender.

Being unable to comprehend let alone refute her points you then resort to an insult based on an unrelated sensationalist book title - a book which you have not read.

Also why is the US data unsubstantiated? Have you looked at the source data? Bet you cant even tell me what the source data is.
pssst. Maggie5 and cartwright wisely have you on ignore. Stop behaving like a little lap dog vying for attention
EFT
 

tesseract

I am Woman
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Posts
10,059
Likes
1,828
Location
Perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Perth Wildcats, Swan Districts
I think that you take the word 'feeling' too literally.
One can say, "I feel you may be wrong" but not sure that they are truly 'feeling' it. What the are really saying is I believe/think you are wrong.
Then these people who say "I feel" rather than "I believe" should learn to communicate better and use language properly. Btw, "I feel" and "I believe" are more or less the same thing in the context in which it's used on these issues, in that it's based on an unsupported position. Also feminists seem to base their beliefs on their feelings, due to ignoring evidence that contradicts their position. Hence Fealz/belief > realz.
 

tesseract

I am Woman
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Posts
10,059
Likes
1,828
Location
Perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Perth Wildcats, Swan Districts
Adding someone's subjective opinion to your own isn't objectivity.
No one said such. I pointed to providing both objective and subjective views. I use these subjective views and observations to display that my position is not merely my personal opinion alone and that it's a talking point among others who recognize the issues I've raised. I have provided objective studies, too. Feminists and SJWs ITT embrace cognitive dissonance by dismissing these and continue to plow on with their dogmatically held views.
 

tesseract

I am Woman
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Posts
10,059
Likes
1,828
Location
Perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Perth Wildcats, Swan Districts
I disagree, but being the coward that you are can see why you would say that.
Shame that there will not be an opportunity for you to speak to them face to face.
Such a wonderful Christian you are, typical bible bashing hypocrite.
You're free to disagree; that's your prerogative. Save your tears for someone who cares. Btw, as a feminist, you're over-qualified to speak as to hypocrites.

Also, you haven't shown how I'm a hypocrite based on my religious beliefs. I suppose that's just more of a feelings-based conclusion you feminists are so inclined to indulge in rather than producing evidence.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Posts
7,072
Likes
5,620
Location
on bail at the time
AFL Club
Collingwood
Then these people who say "I feel" rather than "I believe" should learn to communicate better and use language properly. Btw, "I feel" and "I believe" are more or less the same thing in the context in which it's used on these issues, in that it's based on an unsupported position. Also feminists seem to base their beliefs on their feelings, due to ignoring evidence that contradicts their position. Hence Fealz/belief > realz.
No one said such. I pointed to providing both objective and subjective views. I use these subjective views and observations to display that my position is not merely my personal opinion alone and that it's a talking point among others who recognize the issues I've raised. I have provided objective studies, too. Feminists and SJWs ITT embrace cognitive dissonance by dismissing these and continue to plow on with their dogmatically held views.
You're free to disagree; that's your prerogative. Save your tears for someone who cares. Btw, as a feminist, you're over-qualified to speak as to hypocrites.

Btw, you haven't shown how I'm a hypocrite based on my religious beliefs. I suppose that's just more of a feelings-based conclusion you feminists are so inclined to indulge in rather than producing evidence.
Ice ruins lives.
 

Sydney Bloods

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Posts
18,214
Likes
13,845
Location
Sydney
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
Coney Island, GWS, The Exers!
Virgin's gonna virg.




Anyway.

What is the general consensus;
Does sexism still exist in Australia (specifically in terms of sexism towards females.) ?

I think "yes".
It most certainly does, institutionalised sexism at that.
But its something the lunatics in this thread could hardly understand.
 

Maggie5

Spec Moderator
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
35,119
Likes
31,776
Location
Victoria
AFL Club
Collingwood
Moderator #6,235
Then these people who say "I feel" rather than "I believe" should learn to communicate better and use language properly. Btw, "I feel" and "I believe" are more or less the same thing in the context in which it's used on these issues, in that it's based on an unsupported position. Also feminists seem to base their beliefs on their feelings, due to ignoring evidence that contradicts their position. Hence Fealz/belief > realz.
So now you are an expert in the English language?
I really do suggest you go back and re-read some of your deranged posts where you just ramble.
I 'feel' you have got it wrong.:p
 

Maggie5

Spec Moderator
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
35,119
Likes
31,776
Location
Victoria
AFL Club
Collingwood
Moderator #6,236
You're free to disagree; that's your prerogative. Save your tears for someone who cares. Btw, as a feminist, you're over-qualified to speak as to hypocrites.

Also, you haven't shown how I'm a hypocrite based on my religious beliefs. I suppose that's just more of a feelings-based conclusion you feminists are so inclined to indulge in rather than producing evidence.
:cry::cry::cry:Shattered:p:p
Such a sad misguided male, no positive female influence in your life?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Maggie5

Spec Moderator
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
35,119
Likes
31,776
Location
Victoria
AFL Club
Collingwood
Moderator #6,238
253 pages is too many pages to go through but has anyone discussed chemical castration in regard to sexual offenders?

Was reading an article and it sounded very interesting. Not sure whether feminists advocated it or if was the general population.
 

kfc1

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 27, 2010
Posts
11,089
Likes
9,938
AFL Club
Essendon
253 pages is too many pages to go through but has anyone discussed chemical castration in regard to sexual offenders?

Was reading an article and it sounded very interesting. Not sure whether feminists advocated it or if was the general population.
This used to be a punishment for homosexuals.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2010
Posts
1,695
Likes
1,779
AFL Club
Fremantle
253 pages is too many pages to go through but has anyone discussed chemical castration in regard to sexual offenders?

Was reading an article and it sounded very interesting. Not sure whether feminists advocated it or if was the general population.
With the amount of sexism in that proposal it had to be feminist born. The amount of male-hate dripping off of it. I can smell it.

Being the bias against men towards women in both sexual offence law, and also that women can't have the process done or at least feminism wouldn't ever allow a similar punishment for a woman offender of sexual offences -- The word reprehensible comes to mind for such a measure. Now a psychotic women could avoid any criminal consequence herself on the male of any revenge urge - she would have herself acted upon otherwise - by having the state act on her behalf, simply by concocting a convincing rape scenario.

I think she should go down the "I was drunk, you know what so was he... But still, how could I, as a woman, possibly consent to sex while intoxicated. Everyone knows women don't have personal responsibility in exclusively sexual matters once they drink" route, and watch the feminist legions reign down support. Even if we find out a year or two after his conviction and subsequent chemical castration that she cooked it all up. He still has legal recourse. He'll get out at some point after an appeals process marred in red tape. He'll never get off again once he is free, but you now. Justice will be done. Eventually.

Justice is always done


Canada man faces 6 months over "twitter harassment"

i.e Arguing with snowflakes whom when simply got offended by completely non threatening tweets, had him arrested after he disagreed with their viewpoints gained from feminist dogma -- He lost his job shortly after being arrested. For a twitter argument.
 

CM86

Anindilyakwa
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Posts
8,817
Likes
7,223
AFL Club
St Kilda
With the amount of sexism in that proposal it had to be feminist born. The amount of male-hate dripping off of it. I can smell it.

Being the bias against men towards women in both sexual offence law, and also that women can't have the process done or at least feminism wouldn't ever allow a similar punishment for a woman offender of sexual offences -- The word reprehensible comes to mind for such a measure. Now a psychotic women could avoid any criminal consequence herself on the male of any revenge urge - she would have herself acted upon otherwise - by having the state act on her behalf, simply by concocting a convincing rape scenario.

I think she should go down the "I was drunk, you know what so was he... But still, how could I, as a woman, possibly consent to sex while intoxicated. Everyone knows women don't have personal responsibility in exclusively sexual matters once they drink" route, and watch the feminist legions reign down support. Even if we find out a year or two after his conviction and subsequent chemical castration that she cooked it all up. He still has legal recourse. He'll get out at some point after an appeals process marred in red tape. He'll never get off again once he is free, but you now. Justice will be done. Eventually.

Justice is always done


Canada man faces 6 months over "twitter harassment"

i.e Arguing with snowflakes whom when simply got offended by completely non threatening tweets, had him arrested after he disagreed with their viewpoints gained from feminist dogma -- He lost his job shortly after being arrested. For a twitter argument.
Is this one of the backed research youtube videos? Or another bullshit one?

"Man faces 6 months in jail for disagreeing with feminists on twitter"?
 

Maggie5

Spec Moderator
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
35,119
Likes
31,776
Location
Victoria
AFL Club
Collingwood
Moderator #6,243
With the amount of sexism in that proposal it had to be feminist born. The amount of male-hate dripping off of it. I can smell it.

Being the bias against men towards women in both sexual offence law, and also that women can't have the process done or at least feminism wouldn't ever allow a similar punishment for a woman offender of sexual offences -- The word reprehensible comes to mind for such a measure. Now a psychotic women could avoid any criminal consequence herself on the male of any revenge urge - she would have herself acted upon otherwise - by having the state act on her behalf, simply by concocting a convincing rape scenario.

I think she should go down the "I was drunk, you know what so was he... But still, how could I, as a woman, possibly consent to sex while intoxicated. Everyone knows women don't have personal responsibility in exclusively sexual matters once they drink" route, and watch the feminist legions reign down support. Even if we find out a year or two after his conviction and subsequent chemical castration that she cooked it all up. He still has legal recourse. He'll get out at some point after an appeals process marred in red tape. He'll never get off again once he is free, but you now. Justice will be done. Eventually.

Justice is always done


Canada man faces 6 months over "twitter harassment"

i.e Arguing with snowflakes whom when simply got offended by completely non threatening tweets, had him arrested after he disagreed with their viewpoints gained from feminist dogma -- He lost his job shortly after being arrested. For a twitter argument.
Why I am I not surprised you jumped on the Feminists are to blame bandwagon. Shame you didn't read up on the subject before you waffled on. Good starting place is the law in California or even Korea.

Further, it is not only crimes against children but female adults, what a surprise.

The interesting point for me are the side affects and that unless chemical castration is also carried together with counseling not always successful.

Seriously think Australia should investigate this and perhaps could form part of the sentencing process.
 
Joined
May 18, 2015
Posts
148
Likes
149
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Female privilege exists for sure. Take the recent Deandre Johnson case. The woman racially slurred, kneed him in the groin and took a swing at him. When he finally retaliated after initially trying to peacefully restrain her, he was the one who was charged and sacked while the woman who started the fight got off scott free. Who would have thought even racism is trumped by female privilege.
 
Top Bottom