You, in typical feminist fashion, have attempted to re-frame the conversation in an attempt to put women's issues front and centre when men's issues have been raised ITT. Here's an example of it:
Your implication here is that the issue of violence against men is secondary to that of violence against women because, as you state, "the numbers are still skewed to women being victims". So, you're not saying that men shouldn't get help, you simply imply that women should be prioritized due to being victims more. What your implication suggests isn't equality - which contradicts feminist rhetoric of standing for equality. So, when you say "Please show where anyone has suggested that both men and women should not get help when needed" exemplifies the typical feminist sophistry attempting to deflect from the stance of prioritizing women's aid at the expense and relegation of men's aid. This is an example of you, a feminist, paying only lip service to 'equality'.