Feminist literate underpins education measures in regards to DV. The emphasis is on the victim - not the perpetrator, so it doesn't get to the cause of offending. This type of literature only ever sees females as the victim, so in regards to domestic violence it is flawed - because DV is a complex dynamic. If men are violent, then why are they violent? These questions aren't answered within the feminist paradigm, they simply aren't interested in the motivations of the offender, they are only interested in the victim, and the victim in their eyes is ALWAYS the female. In the 70's the feminists actually went off of a medical model, which concentrated on the offender, but then critics harped that it neglected the victim, so they went away with that system. Now they've shifted towards targeting men in groups -as an aggregate - and educating them. Just throw a net over men, they are perps and need to be educated. But, that doesn't get to the cause of DV, convenient, because the feminist literate assumes women are always innocent, they are always the victims. Australia needs to get real on this issue, and have a balanced discussion about it. Because women aren't always the victims. Sorry to disappoint you.