Magma
TheBrownDog
yeah that would help our case ayNo, "they" aren't going to help Man City deflect attention and blameshift.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yeah that would help our case ayNo, "they" aren't going to help Man City deflect attention and blameshift.
yeah that would help our case ay
Bit of outrage. Bit of triumphalism. Bit of fatalism.What’s the general feeling on Blue Moon?
would be funny thoWouldn't do anything except make spinning to the fans that the club is a victim easier.
It was built about 50 years agoHaha. I find it such a weird hatred built over the internet/TV.
Didnt think he was that old.It was built about 50 years ago
Oh I thought you meant spurs fans in generalDidnt think he was that old.
Don’t get me started on you lot, I still want retroactive de-registration for bribing your way back into the league.Very valid points raised here Doc, would the same apply for Chelsea though?
Edit: as usual Chef beat me to it!
Unlikely, but in theory would mean ManU and Liverpool would have 2 titles each extraI'm prepared to give City the benefit of the doubt until it all comes out in the wash in the CAS hearing. But if CAS finds in favour of UEFA, the book should be thrown at City. If City also breached FFP rules in the prem, they should be stripped of the 4 league titles won since 2012, including the titles won after 2016.
Unlikely, but I theory would mean ManU and Liverpool would have 2 titles each extra
they’d centre their defence against UEFA’s investigation on the key pieces of evidence being illegally obtained and inadmissible, rather than clarify the context of those documents which they claimed in their statement at the time would exonerate the club.
Our appeal was based on the legitimacy of the process. Not the actual decision, or the legitimacy of the source of information used.
Procedural errors were the only thing we could appeal against at that stage of the investigation. I'm sure when the time comes our appeal to this decision will be much broader.
Our position from the outset is that UEFA/CFCB had pre-determined the outcome and that we'd need to present our evidence to an independent body.Did you break the rules or not? The club have suggested they have irrefutable evidence to support their claim that they didn’t, presumably if this evidence had been provided to UEFA investigators this would have all been defused by now.
The fact we are where we are suggests to me that this evidence likely doesn’t exist.
Our position from the outset is that UEFA/CFCB had pre-determined the outcome and that we'd need to present our evidence to an independent body.
Lol. Because the head investigator said you could face a ban if the allegations were proven?
That's crackpot conspiracy theory territory. Don't see that approach working well with CAS.