- Joined
- Oct 2, 2002
- Posts
- 16,124
- Reaction score
- 22
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
And I disagree with you on both those points.Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
Let's get this straight - Marsh is not up to AFL standard & is wasting a valuable spot on our list.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Soccer Notice Image
Champions League - FINAL - PSG v Arsenal ⚽ Europa Semis ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - SEMIS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ FA Cup - Man City Win
And I disagree with you on both those points.Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
Let's get this straight - Marsh is not up to AFL standard & is wasting a valuable spot on our list.
Rubbish and Rubbish.Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
Let's get this straight - Marsh is not up to AFL standard & is wasting a valuable spot on our list.

We will agree to disagree.Originally posted by DaveW
And I disagree with you on both those points.
Originally posted by Stiffy_18
Rubbish and Rubbish.
People seem to forget that in 2001 Marsh was our 2nd choice ruckman and has played some very good football in that year, getting into the Crows best players a number of times. You don't get
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I am all for trading to get Jamar but our 2nd rounds draft pick is the most I would offer for him. I doubt Melbourne would go for that. They would much rather trade White, that would free up some salary cap room for them and get them a hell of a lot in return.Originally posted by Leaping Lindner
What do think about chasing Jamar as a back up ruckman to Doc and Rhett?
I don't think Melbourne want to lose Jamar but if we can offer a reasonable trade I reckon they'd come to the party.
Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
Let's get this straight - Marsh is not up to AFL standard & is wasting a valuable spot on our list. What is the point in keeping someone who will not make it. Better of drafting someone with unknown potentil.
Originally posted by Leaping Lindner
[BWhat do think about chasing Jamar as a back up ruckman to Doc and Rhett?
[/B]
No chance of me boycotting a game - I went when David Gallagher played & he fustrated the $h!t out of me too!Originally posted by dezzmo
Kane, this must be the most passionate I've seen you over a topic. Would you boycott a match if Marsh was get a gig next year?
It probably takes the edge off supporting the team if the side has someone you have absolutely no time on the list - and as our ONLY backup ruckman, he is always a chance to play.
Westies are happy with him - they can keep him!Originally posted by Stiffy_18
I am all for trading to get Jamar but our 2nd rounds draft pick is the most I would offer for him. I doubt Melbourne would go for that. They would much rather trade White, that would free up some salary cap room for them and get them a hell of a lot in return.
How the heck can the Dees be so close to the salary cap with their list? White would be a great pickup if Biglands wanted to leave (which I doubt). Otherwise we need a younger ruckman who will be ready to take over from Clarke in a few years.Originally posted by macca23
I think you're right on all counts Stiffy. He's definitely worth a try but White probably would be the one they would want to unload due to salary cap pressures and his trade value.
Interestingly enough, White is only 26 years of age, so he does have a lot of footy ahead of him.
However with thge two ruckmen we do have and our own salary cap pressures, I can't see White being the correct option in any respect, whereas a Jamar might well be, if available at a reasonable price, which I doubt.
Its called mismanagment Kane. With players like Yze, Johnstone and Neitz on some $500K no wonder they are close to red.Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
How the heck can the Dees be so close to the salary cap with their list?
Yeah I realise it is mismanagement, but even if these 3 guys are getting $500K each, they must have some lesser names still on big bucks if they are close to the cap as their list doesn't go very deep.Originally posted by Stiffy_18
Its called mismanagment Kane. With players like Yze, Johnstone and Neitz on some $500K no wonder they are close to red.
I reckon White would be also close to $500K so thats 4 players that eat up $2Million of the salary cap. Theay are still paying out part of Woewodin's contract and they would have the likes of Bruce, Brown, Vardy and a couple of others who would be on some $300-$350K a year.Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
Yeah I realise it is mismanagement, but even if these 3 guys are getting $500K each, they must have some lesser names still on big bucks if they are close to the cap as their list doesn't go very deep.