Come on mate, everyone had a soft spot for Richmond after 35 years of ineptitude...BLASPHEMY! Didn't even read the rest of the post, how dare you!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Come on mate, everyone had a soft spot for Richmond after 35 years of ineptitude...BLASPHEMY! Didn't even read the rest of the post, how dare you!
I never said invalid.In 1964 when Collingwood had 13, Melbourne 12, Essendon 11 and Carlton 8 you would've laughed at those who said Carlton would be first to 14 too I bet.
The game tends to go in cycles, there's no reason why someones opinion that Richmond or Hawthorn will win 4 more before Carlton, Essendon or Collingwood get another 1 (or 2) is invalid.
Bring it back I reckon.Ah yes, those were the days...
Great memories.
I never said invalid.
Just highly, highly unlikely.
Might run some numbers if I get some time on the weekend...
OK.You called them "deluded Richmond suppprters"
Numbers don't mean anything if your just going to go by 1/18th per year chance. On that logic Freo should have a flag by now and Saints should have at least 6 or 7.
Come on mate, everyone had a soft spot for Richmond after 35 years of ineptitude...
Noone does ineptitude like Richmond.Yet no one has a soft spot for our 6 + decades of ineptitude.
Try again.
Noone does ineptitude like Richmond.
You know what was also more likely 6 years ago? Collingwood hitting 17 before Richmond hit 13.I got great enjoyment from Richmond winning the flag in 2017, so much so that I wore a Richmond guernsey in a pool bar whilst holidaying with great friends of mine who are all Richmond supporters - one of the most enjoyable Grand Finals I have seen.
But I like to play the numbers, and I would bet anyone I know as much as they want that:
A) Carlton or Essendon will get there first, or
B) if it's neither of them, it will be Collingwood ahead of anyone else.
My point was there are some deluded Richmond supporters that honestly believe they are more likely to win four more flags before any of the above scenarios eventuate. On a simple numbers game, the odds of that happening would be in the realm of 100 to 1.
Noone does ineptitude like Richmond.
Yep. Once the Pies get to 35 years without contending for a flag, I'll acknowledge we've sunk to Richmond's depths.Mate, do you really wanna compare our mob to literally anyone else at the moment? Pushin sh*t up hill to win that argument.
Yep. Once the Pies get to 35 years without contending for a flag, I'll acknowledge we've sunk to Richmond's depths.
We are currently in Year 2.
Yep. I'm sure it was all part of their strategy.Richmond's depths? They've just won 3 of the last 4 flags and you wanna talk about depths?!
It's not about contending them, it's about winning them.
For the thread title it's unlikely to be us.
Yep. I'm sure it was all part of their strategy.
'Let's be absolute crap for 35 years, and then sneak up on everyone to win 3 flags in 4 years'...
Yep. I'm sure it was all part of their strategy.
'Let's be absolute crap for 35 years, and then sneak up on everyone to win 3 flags in 4 years'...
It's not unlikely.As unlikely as it may seem, I still think first to 17 will be one of Carlton of Essendon.
It's not unlikely.
It's about an 80% probability.
Adelaide
I come back from the future and we get 17th flag in 2078.
The threepeat of 2077-76-78 got us past Essendon, Carlton and Gold Coast all stuck on 16.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
1Melbourne?
How many flags have the Power won?
In 1964 when Collingwood had 13, Melbourne 12, Essendon 11 and Carlton 8 you would've laughed at those who said Carlton would be first to 14 too I bet.
The game tends to go in cycles, there's no reason why someones opinion that Richmond or Hawthorn will win 4 more before Carlton, Essendon or Collingwood get another 1 (or 2) is invalid.
It's not unlikely.
It's about an 80% probability.
Melbourne a chance.
Not seen a midfield set up this good in a long long time.
You got the perfect ruck division of Gawn and Jackson. Then you got the engine room of Petracca, Oliver and Viney that very hard to stop as they combine beautifully and attack straight away from the centre break. Even the Lions in early 2000's did not have a ruck division this good.
If they can keep them all on park for next five to six years, anything is possible. It really interesting that Beveridge is someone that does not rate the ruck that important. I think he got a lesson in never underestimate what a dominant ruckmen giving you the perfect set up from engine room.
It is also good for football to see a midfield like that.