Astronomy First Exo-moon Found!

Remove this Banner Ad

Apr 24, 2013
81,024
153,169
Arden Street Hill
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Essendon Lawn Bowls Club
A Neptune-Sized Moon Orbiting a Jupiter-Sized Planet

A pair of astronomers combing through data from the Kepler spacecraft have discovered the first exomoon. The moon is in the Kepler 1625 system about 8,000 light years away, in the constellation Cygnus. It orbits the gas giant Kepler 1625b, and, unlike all the moons in our Solar System, this one is a “gas moon.”

It was only a matter of time before we found an exomoon. We’ve found thousands of exoplanets, thanks mostly to the Kepler spacecraft. And where there are planets, we can expect moons. But even though it seemed inevitable, the first confirmed exomoon is still exciting.

STSCI-H-p1845b-z-2000x1750-resized.jpg

This diagram shows the sequence of photometric observations taken by Hubble. The purple object represents the planet Kepler 1625b, and the smaller green object is that planet’s exomoon. The exomoon travels in front of the star about 3.5 hours after the planet. Image: NASA, ESA, D. Kipping (Columbia University), and A. Feild (STScI)

The exomoon is much different than what we see in our own Solar System. It orbits a gas giant several times larger than Jupiter, called Kepler 1625b. Preliminary evidence indicates that the moon itself, which is called Kepler 1625b I, is a gas moon, and is about the size of Neptune. Nothing like this exists in our system.

https://www.universetoday.com/14017...e-sized-moon-orbiting-a-jupiter-sized-planet/
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Same. It's pretty amazing what they can detect from 8000 light years!
Yeh, crazy distances.

If you want to hurt your brain.
With the naked eye, we can see the Andromeda Galaxy on a good night, with a dark sky and it’s 2.5 million light years away.

Back to the above story.
It would be interesting to know if the moon is the same gas as the parent planet.
 
Back to the above story.
It would be interesting to know if the moon is the same gas as the parent planet.
They might be able to determine the planet's composition from the emission spectrum. If so and if there were any changes over time from the moon orbiting in and out of sight, they could in turn determine the moon's composition.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
They might be able to determine the planet's composition from the emission spectrum. If so and if there were any changes over time from the moon orbiting in and out of sight, they could in turn determine the moon's composition.

Yep





 
They might be able to determine the planet's composition from the emission spectrum. If so and if there were any changes over time from the moon orbiting in and out of sight, they could in turn determine the moon's composition.

You are right in general :) But for this particular system atmospheric characterisation of the planet (and definitely of the moon) is out of reach for now. The system is too far away, and hence too faint. It's also a rather cold system, which makes atmospheric characterisation tough. Yes, it has been done for some exoplanets, but typically only very hot ones, so on orbits less than say one tenth of Earth's orbital distance (this planet has an orbit almost exactly as wide as Earth's)

On a side note, this would not yet be considered a discovery, even by the authors, who are refreshingly honest and skeptical. It could definitely turn out to be a false positive.
 
You are right in general :) But for this particular system atmospheric characterisation of the planet (and definitely of the moon) is out of reach for now. The system is too far away, and hence too faint. It's also a rather cold system, which makes atmospheric characterisation tough. Yes, it has been done for some exoplanets, but typically only very hot ones, so on orbits less than say one tenth of Earth's orbital distance (this planet has an orbit almost exactly as wide as Earth's)

On a side note, this would not yet be considered a discovery, even by the authors, who are refreshingly honest and skeptical. It could definitely turn out to be a false positive.
Cheers, I was thinking 8000 ly was a long way for light to travel and that spectral analysis would be hard!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top