Remove this Banner Ad

First Test Squad Announced

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Marsh made a ton.

That's worth 5 tons in a row from Joe Burns or Callum Ferguson etc.

Burns has scored a lot more this year and frankly we know Shaun's inconsistency
 
Burns has scored a lot more this year and frankly we know his inconsistency

That's good for Joe Burns, I am pleased for him that he is having a good Shield season.

Is he the son of Geoff Marsh? Has he made test 100s for Australia before? Is his brother in the team?
 
That's good for Joe Burns, I am pleased for him that he is having a good Shield season.

Is he the son of Geoff Marsh? Has he made test 100s for Australia before? Is his brother in the team?

Would Shaun have even got a chance of his name wasn't Marsh- meh still a week for him to do his hammy lol

Can he beat his 2.8 average against India from Last time lmao
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Marsh will get the nod. I would go Ferguson.

But I reckon the selectors had Hughes and Marsh a good bit in front of the next contender.
 
Would Shaun have even got a chance of his name wasn't Marsh- meh still a week for him to do his hammy lol

Can he beat his 2.8 average against India from Last time lmao
You're kidding. are we actually picking someone who averaged less than 5 last time we played India? Bring back Quiney against SA then;)

Don't really think we're a better side with Marsh in but it's his spot to lose now.
 
Last edited:
You're kidding. are we actually picking someone who averaged less than 5 last time we played India? Bring back Quiney against SA then;)

Don't really think we're a better side with Marsh in but it's his spot to lose now.

His scores resembled a mobile phone number lol
 
Joe Burns has made 2 meaningful contributions this Shield season. Would have Handscomb ahead Joe whilst Ferguson would be a step ahead again IMHO as a proven international performer.

Burns is batting in the top order. I love Handscomb but he is batting 7 this season. Ferguson hasn't shown me he will be any better than a Doolan type. Might as well pick Doolan or Cowan to average 30. Burns has 2 hundreds, a good score yesterday.
 
Given Harris needed to complete a full shield match- is 13 overs sufficient to prove his fitness?

I guess we might get Johnson, Hazlewood and Siddle at the Gabba with Harris coming in for the last three tests
 
I think 13 overs is enough for Harris. Bowled 20 odd in the first round of the shield. A few more in the nets if need be over the next week and he'll be right to go.
 
Did harris need the full match in the eyes of selectors?

Sounds like he was more keen than they were for the extra run, if he pulls up good i would play him but im not in the loop so not sure what they needed from him to be ok with him playing at the gabba.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Unlike our batsmen i think they can safely do that, harris won't pass himself if he doesn't think he can make it through the 5 days.

Yep. They were going to call him fit after the first shield match but Harris told them that he needed to have another match to be sure.
 
13 overs may be enough but we don't know for sure. It does sound like the selectors are going to let Harris make the call.
Would it be worthwhile for him to line up in grade cricket on Saturday to get some overs in the legs or just bowl in the nets?
 
Would it be worthwhile for him to line up in grade cricket on Saturday to get some overs in the legs or just bowl in the nets?

Probably is worth it.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Burns is batting in the top order. I love Handscomb but he is batting 7 this season. Ferguson hasn't shown me he will be any better than a Doolan type. Might as well pick Doolan or Cowan to average 30. Burns has 2 hundreds, a good score yesterday.

Handscomb has not batted 7 once this year.
 
Handscomb has not batted 7 once this year.

He is playing as the keeper while Wade is away at least. Whilst I rate the bloke, he needs to bat at 3 or 4 to be considered for a top 4 spot, especially when he is outside the squad.
 
He is playing as the keeper while Wade is away at least. Whilst I rate the bloke, he needs to bat at 3 or 4 to be considered for a top 4 spot, especially when he is outside the squad.

Shaun Marsh has batted at 5
 
We are looking for a number 4-5...so yes. We are not looking for a number 6/7.

What is the difference between 5 and 6?

Especially since he has batted at 3 last year.

I would have no problems bringing in Burns at 4 for instance and he's being opening.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom