Should've explained myself better.
If those in charge already had their minds made up in delisting Ross, despite his form warranting a game, they didn't play him. If he had have played extremely well, there would be a large uproar when he was delisted, so thus they didn't give him the chance.
Just my $0.02.
That sound like conspiracy theory 101.
An uproar by who? Big Footy posters? He's hardly Keith Greig.
I'm sure there's nothing more suspicious here than a coaching staff who probably thought he wasn't up to the required standard.
It's bad luck for the lad, but hardly without precedence.





