Fleming,Hyde,Staff and Richo out this week so whose in?

wrennyboy

Premiership Player
Joined
Dec 8, 2003
Posts
3,865
Likes
2,308
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Liverpool FC
Thread starter #1
In my opinion i would have Roach,Tuck,Pettifer and Shultz

B: Fiora Gasper Zantuck
HB: Hartigan A.Kellaway Chaffey
C: Tivendale Johnson Newman
HF: Bowden Morrison Hall
FF: Krakouer Shultz Brown
Foll: Ottens Cogs Campbell
Int: Tuck Pettifer Rodan Roach
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

cairo tiger

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 11, 2003
Posts
6,666
Likes
5,097
Location
back home and living the tiger dream
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
tigers
#4
tell me why you would want to play houley doolie and pettifer. they have one good game and everyone wants them in-****! they are failed performers why will they change now-
play the kids

roach, tuck etc and bloody rodan can **** of to and get some kicks in the ressies
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2004
Posts
1,150
Likes
1
Location
Simmonds>Ottens
Other Teams
Richmond.
#8
no way

i don't think Roach and Tuck should be brought into a losing side...when the boys are on a winning roll...give 'em a go ...get them into a winning mentality.

In: Marsh, Schulz, Pettifer
out staff, richo, hyde.
 
Joined
Aug 19, 2003
Posts
302
Likes
3
Location
Over there somewhere!
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Richmond
#11
Well it appears Houlihan & Marsh are not options because they are injured

Outs: Richo, Hyde, Stafford

In: Schulz, Roach & Weller.

Ray Hall survives only because Stafford's suspended. Rodan gets the nod only because he does have pace - and can kick a goal.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

rfctigerarmy

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 7, 2001
Posts
21,828
Likes
11,017
Location
Punt Road
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Melbourne Heart, Furies
#12
I dont think Rodan should be getting a game (and have made that clear in the past). Frawley and his team arn't strong enough on poor performances.
 

oxx

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 23, 2003
Posts
8,748
Likes
13
Location
Here.
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
())(())(())(())(())(())((
#14
Re: no way

Originally posted by DirtyDogTiger
i don't think Roach and Tuck should be brought into a losing side...when the boys are on a winning roll...give 'em a go ...get them into a winning mentality.
So we shouold wait until 2005 ?

Bleed them now and see what they've got Dirty Dog.

We need guys who will "step up" under adversity and atm we
have an abundance of that !
 

kretchy

Premiership Player
Joined
Apr 25, 2001
Posts
3,834
Likes
3
Location
-
AFL Club
Richmond
#15
Originally posted by cairo tiger
tell me why you would want to play houley doolie and pettifer. they have one good game and everyone wants them in-****! they are failed performers why will they change now-
play the kids

roach, tuck etc and bloody rodan can **** of to and get some kicks in the ressies
You don't want to play Pettifer and you suggest to play the kids. You include Tuck as a kid who was born before Pettifer so obviously Pettifer still qualifies as a kid as well.
 

nineteen eighty

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 18, 2003
Posts
5,777
Likes
5,357
Location
Sydney
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
TIGERS
#16
FF will be the interesting position. Before Stafford was rubbed out, I would have had him at FF with Ottens continuing in the ruck and Marsh on the bench. With Stafford out, I think I would go for Zantuck at FF, Schultz the back-up and Marsh definately on the bench to give Ottens a rest. IMO, Pettifer is not the answer and has had enough chances.

The problem we have is that if our game plan is to chip the ball around until we can free someone up, then we will crucify whoever we put at FF.
 
Top Bottom