Remove this Banner Ad

Fletcher and the Umpire

  • Thread starter Thread starter shane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

your right shane.
I think it was a discrase to see a player get reporting for interfering with an umpire.
there were 2 other similar incedents earlier in the year, its just pethetic, AFL is becoming more and more like netball each year.
It does rule, in the rule book that if u touch an umpire u get a free kick against you
 
I watched the incident again last night & feel that it was up to Fletcher to avoid the ump, who had just bounced the ball & was running backwards, which is what they are required to do, to give the players in front of him room to get to the ball. A Freo player was running towards him to try & get to the ball, while Fletcher was running in from behind him, the ump was sandwiched, what was he supposed to do, it was up to Fletcher to avoid the contact, therefore I can't see how anyone can say it is a joke of a report.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Because, Mantis my little piranha, good players only have eyes for the ball and their opponent. It's called commitment. The maggots in white are supposed to be invisible to play, not bloody prima donnas
 
He better not get suspended. I will absoluetely spew if he does.

Imagine if this costs a plyer a bronlow medal one day. Because some ******* umpire gets in his road.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom