So ARU will argue that he committed sexual discrimination and Issy will argue that the ARU has committed Religious discrimination. This will be very messy.
Shouldn’t be. He’s right and the ARU is wrong.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 12
SuperCoach Rd 12 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC - 2026 Fight MND Comp ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 12 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
So ARU will argue that he committed sexual discrimination and Issy will argue that the ARU has committed Religious discrimination. This will be very messy.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/...k/news-story/030c7861b8d944004f46ffc122430672
Aussie UFC fighter Tai tuivasa goes bang on Izzy's comments
Wouldn't mind seeing Tai flatline Izzy to be honest.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/...k/news-story/030c7861b8d944004f46ffc122430672
Aussie UFC fighter Tai tuivasa goes bang on Izzy's comments
Wouldn't mind seeing Tai flatline Izzy to be honest.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/...k/news-story/030c7861b8d944004f46ffc122430672
Aussie UFC fighter Tai tuivasa goes bang on Izzy's comments
Wouldn't mind seeing Tai flatline Izzy to be honest.

“I’m outraged Izzy dared to say he doesn’t like something and they might Be going to an imaginary place”
“I wanna see someone physically beat him till he dies”
You people are all insane. Seriously, absolutely ******* cooked![]()
The code of conduct defines matters that label a breach as "high level". These include that “the conduct may have caused offence to the general public’s sensibilities” … and that … “The conduct more than likely breaches Rugby Australia’s core values.”
These are very difficult concepts about which reasonable minds might differ. Even Rugby Australia’s inclusion policy is not without its difficulties. Clearly the intent is to whole-heartedly "include" the gay community in the rugby movement. But is its intention to "exclude" traditional Christian and other religious beliefs? The controversy threatens to become a legal and moral minefield.
The irony of you being outraged at Folau's comments yet happy to state youd be happy for him to be beaten.https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/...k/news-story/030c7861b8d944004f46ffc122430672
Aussie UFC fighter Tai tuivasa goes bang on Izzy's comments
Wouldn't mind seeing Tai flatline Izzy to be honest.
That's fine but I was responding to someone who said Folau brought politics into sport. He wasn't the one to initiate that. That happened when Rugby Australia charged him for sharing his religious views. I dont think Folau posted with the intention to spark a debate and legal hearing on religious freedom (is what his lawyers will argue) for professional athletes.
public opinion will only put up with so much.
There's no way 50% of the population are practicing Christians. What you put down on a census form and what you believe are different.
Nowadays I almost never meet anyone who believes in the baby jebus
Of course I am not saying he is smart or clever to do it, or that I would want to do the same. I'm just advocating for his right to make his own decision to express his religious views. And he was not the one who brought politics into sport.Then he must be excessively stupid/naive, because he'd been warned not to post this stuff in the past and he kept doing it. He's not some 12 year old playing with his dad's PC during the holidays. Rugby Australia are hardly the only people in the world offended by this stuff. They'd love to keep Folau, he's almost their best player, but public opinion will only put up with so much.
I don't actually know want him beaten to death. That kind of thinking is reserved for religious extremists
It does not need to be an individual, it can be a group or class of people who are victims of discrimination.Can you name what rights of people Folau violated and how he discriminated against them . For discrimination to occur an INDIVIDUAL has to be discriminated against .
Who did he discriminate against and how did he discriminate ?
You’re the one who said you wanted him “flatlined”.
It does not need to be an individual, it can be a group or class of people who are victims of discrimination.
He stated that due to the person they inherently are that they would be going to hell. He said this after making a commitment to his employer that he would not make this type of statement, AGAIN!
How can you punish someone for directly following Christian values
Yeah I think I meant flattened
Sorry but plenty of Christian groups openly say every group he named is going to hell.I would have thought "Christian values" meant living your life in accordance with Christian morals, which includes the ethos "live and let live" and not attacking others for what they may believe in. I'm torn in this argument because although I believe people should be able to stand up and voice their opinions (within reason), I'm also one who believes if you are willing to accept money from an employer, you work under certain rules and guidelines that prohibit you from voicing your opinions if they are contrary to those of your employer. It makes for an interesting debate. Although society exists under the premise of "freedom of speech", there really is no such animal. None of us enjoy the freedom to say whatever we like.