HappyPunter82
Draftee
- Aug 7, 2019
- 16
- 46
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Seriously the best footy pod by the length of the Flemington straight - open up a Patreon so we can throw a few sheckles at you to keep it viable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
lol,magnificent read,im only 3 yrs younger than finey and everything he describes resonates 100%...cold pies,warm soft drink,jam donuts,Hi guys,
Thought I'd post this piece by Finey on the Footyology website about things we'll never see in footy again. I reckon it's one of his best efforts, a cracking good read. Hope you enjoy it...
Finey's Final Siren: Lest we forget footy favourites lost | Footyology
In "Finey's Final Siren", Mark Fine laments the passing of his youth, and the intrinsic elements of the footy of old that have also passed on with it.footyology.com.au
I can't imagine what it's like having a public profile and having anonymous strangers bagging me on the internet knowing that I'll read it, I have no experience of this. So maybe you will write off my opinion as being completely ignorant (which would be fair enough).
But I think you give way too much airtime calling out some bigfooty flog, who is probably posting from his mum's basement jerking himself off saying "i have an insider, I know s**t, pay attention to me!"
I love the Footyology podcast, I love that it's different, and I love that it's independent. But I reckon that responding to this s**t is beneath both of you. And I reckon spending almost 10 minutes on it is beneath not only you, but all of us as listeners. It's just not good to listen to. If you have any issue with what someone has written on BF, address it here or send them a PM - don't give this flog the attention he so dearly craves (but doesn't deserve) by giving it 10 minutes on the show.
I also say this in the most respectful way that I possibly can - I think after Finey explained what happened with Hutchison a couple of months ago, his time at SEN should've been left alone on Footyology. I think it's obvious that Mark still doesn't quite understand why Hutchison didn't want him, I think it's obvious that he's defensive of his ratings and his time at SEN, and I think it's obvious that he's still hurt by how it ended. I just fear that what is a good, independent media watch segment is becoming an opportunity to grind axes (be it with SEN or with some anonymous flog BF poster.)
I can't imagine what it's like having a public profile and having anonymous strangers bagging me on the internet knowing that I'll read it, I have no experience of this. So maybe you will write off my opinion as being completely ignorant (which would be fair enough).
But I think you give way too much airtime calling out some bigfooty flog, who is probably posting from his mum's basement jerking himself off saying "i have an insider, I know s**t, pay attention to me!"
I love the Footyology podcast, I love that it's different, and I love that it's independent. But I reckon that responding to this s**t is beneath both of you. And I reckon spending almost 10 minutes on it is beneath not only you, but all of us as listeners. It's just not good to listen to. If you have any issue with what someone has written on BF, address it here or send them a PM - don't give this flog the attention he so dearly craves (but doesn't deserve) by giving it 10 minutes on the show.
I also say this in the most respectful way that I possibly can - I think after Finey explained what happened with Hutchison a couple of months ago, his time at SEN should've been left alone on Footyology. I think it's obvious that Mark still doesn't quite understand why Hutchison didn't want him, I think it's obvious that he's defensive of his ratings and his time at SEN, and I think it's obvious that he's still hurt by how it ended. I just fear that what is a good, independent media watch segment is becoming an opportunity to grind axes (be it with SEN or with some anonymous flog BF poster.)
Hi guys,
Latest episode of the podcast is up. This week, Finey and I talk Blake Caracella's move home, the absence of Alex Rance from Richmond's flag tilt and the status of Joe Daniher. "Media Watch" discusses women in AFL commentary and anonymous internet trolls, with specific reference to another thread on this site. And, of course, the usual previews & prizes.
Cheers,
Rohan
Footyology podcast: Appointments and absentees | Footyology
footyology.com.au
good post tho i disagree on the point that finey gave too much air time on being defamed...for ppl such as myself whove never heard the reason behind his departure before & has read some not so nice things said about him on here i fully understand the time taken in sraightening up the record,i thought it was handled professionally and succintly as could be considering the accusations thrown...& for the record ive been managed out of an organisation before,I can't imagine what it's like having a public profile and having anonymous strangers bagging me on the internet knowing that I'll read it, I have no experience of this. So maybe you will write off my opinion as being completely ignorant (which would be fair enough).
But I think you give way too much airtime calling out some bigfooty flog, who is probably posting from his mum's basement jerking himself off saying "i have an insider, I know s**t, pay attention to me!"
I love the Footyology podcast, I love that it's different, and I love that it's independent. But I reckon that responding to this s**t is beneath both of you. And I reckon spending almost 10 minutes on it is beneath not only you, but all of us as listeners. It's just not good to listen to. If you have any issue with what someone has written on BF, address it here or send them a PM - don't give this flog the attention he so dearly craves (but doesn't deserve) by giving it 10 minutes on the show.
I also say this in the most respectful way that I possibly can - I think after Finey explained what happened with Hutchison a couple of months ago, his time at SEN should've been left alone on Footyology. I think it's obvious that Mark still doesn't quite understand why Hutchison didn't want him, I think it's obvious that he's defensive of his ratings and his time at SEN, and I think it's obvious that he's still hurt by how it ended. I just fear that what is a good, independent media watch segment is becoming an opportunity to grind axes (be it with SEN or with some anonymous flog BF poster.)
Just wanted to say that I enjoy this podcast and its consistent format. Really all I need to hear is a bit of focus on each game in a round (before and after) but for some reason that's hard to find anywhere else. Maybe should look at adding Patreon or other form of donation sourcing to the website like other podcasts have.
Forums like Bigfooty are peppered with those so called "in the know" types that like to spread rumours just to big note themselves. You just take what they say with a grain of salt as most of their rumours turn out to be rubbish but even when they are proven false some of that mud can still stick so I can understand why Finey would be annoyed by it and would want to set the record straight.
This thread has turned to s**t.
Let's face it. nobby is a crap poster who cracks the s**ts at anyone, anything and anywhere. If it wasn't one particular point of the episode, it would've been another. Not just that, there's a very personally tone to s/he/it post.
Even if s/he/it makes a good point. You may take it on board, but don't acknowledge it
If I were Finey, In the next episode of Footyology, I'd bring up the first line in nobby's post, then spend 10hoursminutes telling s/he/it that they don't know what it's like and to stfu. The after that, I'd spend 15 minutes putting to bed once and for all MacMum's pot shots.
Forums like Bigfooty are peppered with those so called "in the know" types that like to spread rumours just to big note themselves. You just take what they say with a grain of salt as most of their rumours turn out to be rubbish but even when they are proven false some of that mud can still stick so I can understand why Finey would be annoyed by it and would want to set the record straight.
Hi folks, Round 21 Review edition of the pod is up! Finey and I run through all nine games, the highs, lows and extremes (both of weather and scoreboard variety) of the weekend, while Canberra and the Bombers come in for a serve in The Rant-Off. Hope you enjoy it ...
Footyology Podcast: Raincoats, long stops or skis? | Footyology
RoCo & Finey wrap up Round 21, a weekend of weather extremes and some extremely low scores!footyology.com.au
Comparing Adelaide to Canberra
Right in the feels
How about the occasional guest rant from Peakey? I miss the old blowhardHi guys,