- Mar 20, 2007
- 28,264
- 24,782
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Haha Lewis saying how great the Brits are cause they dont boo
10 seconds later, Nico gets booed
10 seconds later, Nico gets booed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
City hall will change the rules when people start switching off.I just hope the other teams catch the Mercs before city hall gets impatient and start changing rules.
Is that before or after the regulation changes next year?City hall will change the rules when people start switching off.
Be nice to see aussie driver win his home race.
F1 is subconsciously drifting towards the A1 Grand Prix set of rulesI just hope the other teams catch the Mercs before city hall gets impatient and start changing rules.
Staying out of trouble and on the road is KimiThe overrated Kimi Raikkonen has quietly moved up to third in the WDC.
I find the penalty harsh - but I don't understand why the radio ban was introduced in the first place.
Surely if 7th gear is likely to lead to a loss/lock of gearbox, creating a slow/stationary car on track it is a safety issue?
I disagree with being allowed driver feedback (speeds, braking, cornering lines) but think teams should be able to radio in strategy (push now, hold back), advise of issues (tire wear, fuel consumption, body damage), etc.
Actual software management of the car I'm not so sure. What do others think? This is now an issue. Should it be?
Nico Rosberg: Gearbox problem.
Tony Ross: Chassis default zero, one.
Tony Ross: Avoid seventh gear Nico.
Nico Rosberg: What does that mean? I have to shift through it.
Tony Ross: Affirm, Nico, affirm. You have to shift through it.
I suppose everyone is entitled to their opinion but I believe Formula One isn't supposed to be a telemetry based remote control sport. If there's a problem with the car let the driver work it out or if the driver can't then bring them into the pits and work it out there.The radio ban is ridiculous, but since its there then the penalty had to stand.
I see your point, but I think given the punishment for a new gearbox or mechanical failure is quite large there should be some leniency. Driving these cars has become more complicated than ever too.I suppose everyone is entitled to their opinion but I believe Formula One isn't supposed to be a telemetry based remote control sport. If there's a problem with the car let the driver work it out or if the driver can't then bring them into the pits and work it out there.
I believe it was Spain in 1994 where Schumacher drove most of the race in 5th gear. There's no real confirmation as to whether or not Schumacher had only 5th gear available or whether or not he only had gears 1-5 (out of 6) but the fact is that he managed to work through the situation, pit twice, and still win the race.
You can call me a traditionalist but I'd rather see a situation where telemetry is only used during practice and gets put into "data gathering" mode during the race for download and review after the race. Critical information such as temperatures and fuel usage should be displayed to the driver for them to sort through during the race.
Having read quite a few different reports from Silverstone I now understand why Mercedes decided to issue the instructions to Rosberg. The decision was based entirely on maximising points. If they didn't issue him instructions the gearbox issue could have been terminal and therefore, as pointed out by ManWithNoName, they chose the risk of a penalty (and a probable 15 points for 3rd) over the probability they might not get any points if they did nothing.I see your point, but I think given the punishment for a new gearbox or mechanical failure is quite large there should be some leniency. Driving these cars has become more complicated than ever too.