sainter
ENGLISH PREMIER LEAGUE
I was just wondering what everyone thinks about tonights match and the idea of clubs having their matches underwritten by sponsors to provide free football matches.
From a supporters perspective (of the away team), I am a little skeptical.
Firstly, I would like to know where the line is going to be drawn. If the experiment is successful and becomes more than just a one off occurence, what are going to be the potential consequences for members, supporters, etc.
While I realise the home team deserves the majority of the rights, is it fair for opposition members to miss out on watching their team play while thousands of neutral supporters attend at the expense of the real supporters. (It is not the Grand Final!)
By disadvantaging the members of both competing clubs, is this going to further discourage people from paying up each year?
Will the crowd be full of people just there for the novelty factor? While we won't know until the game, would it be better to have a crowd of 25,000-30,000 real supporters rather than a sell out.
I don't know. Perhaps I am a little paranoid (or pessimistic). It just seems like nothing but a money making scheme for the Western Bulldogs to me.
Although I do have to admit that it will make a change for us to play in front of a large crowd there. And playing for the right to donate money to either the Trevor Barker or E.J Whitten Foundations is a great gesture.
Go the sainters!!!
From a supporters perspective (of the away team), I am a little skeptical.
Firstly, I would like to know where the line is going to be drawn. If the experiment is successful and becomes more than just a one off occurence, what are going to be the potential consequences for members, supporters, etc.
While I realise the home team deserves the majority of the rights, is it fair for opposition members to miss out on watching their team play while thousands of neutral supporters attend at the expense of the real supporters. (It is not the Grand Final!)
By disadvantaging the members of both competing clubs, is this going to further discourage people from paying up each year?
Will the crowd be full of people just there for the novelty factor? While we won't know until the game, would it be better to have a crowd of 25,000-30,000 real supporters rather than a sell out.
I don't know. Perhaps I am a little paranoid (or pessimistic). It just seems like nothing but a money making scheme for the Western Bulldogs to me.
Although I do have to admit that it will make a change for us to play in front of a large crowd there. And playing for the right to donate money to either the Trevor Barker or E.J Whitten Foundations is a great gesture.
Go the sainters!!!