Shaneprice97
Norm Smith Medallist
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2013
- Posts
- 5,240
- Reaction score
- 6,743
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Collingwood VFL
Looks alot better than Mike Pyke did this early in his career
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

The key difference there, IMO, is that all those you mentioned are ruckman and he'll never be our first choice ruckman whilst Grundy is fit. Without that first ruck exposure he's left to fill a peripheral role which he's not quite productive enough in his marking or ruckwork to fill adequately ATM (it may come with time).
How's about this from left field. Would we have been any worse off last night playing Goldsack as the relief ruck? I don't rate his marking or ruckwork, but Cox gave us neither and I know Goldsack would have provided a shitload more at ground level.
I believe there's a multitude of threads already shitcanning Cloke so why bring it to this one?
Given we've excused Cox for the umpires shit work why don't we analyse the other two times he held the ball in his hands in 90% game time? What does he do off the ball? How well does he go on the hit up lead? Does he create space for other forwards or is he always anchored to the square when not in the ruck?
Are those areas of his game improving enough for him to be a contributor of a top four team? Because that's what its all about isn't it. Building a premiership list and the lack of continuous improvement is starting to concern me.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Agree - he needs to bulk up a little and strengthen his core - if he does that he'll create some real headaches. Bloody hard being a forward with the way the ball was delivered on Friday night,His lack of body strength is concerning, and he certainly does go at the pill above his head with the intent he needs to.
Reckon a very solid pre-season will do him wonders, can see him greatly improving next year.
Keen to see what he can do with two or three good mobile marking targets working in front of him, such as, Fas, Moore and Elliott (fingers crossed).On Friday he hurt himself early and never fully recovered from it.
He was also playing as the no1 or no 2 marking forward with Moore and fasolo missing... and with cloke not firing, he was double teamed at times. He's a no 4 ruck/forward who will get his best results when the no 1 and no 2 defenders are not on him. Cox is one of our few success stories this year and deserves an upgrade to the senior list at years end
I take your point that younger would likely be better, but if we end up with an above average tall forward for about 5 years from the Cat. B LIST, it is still valuable.Next project player we get from America needs to be 16-18 and learn the game earlier. 25 is too late.
Odd that lots of people were saying that Aish was a spud, a bust and would never be any good earlier this season then, if everything he does is AFL qualityEdit: there's a big difference between Aish and Cox in terms of talent anyone doubting Aish was ill advised. Aish was put on this earth to play AFL footy everything he does is AFL quality. Cox on the other hand is playing because he's tall. They are literally incomparable.
Where's the big fella at?
Last night we saw one mark from him, four of his six possessions came from free kicks, he had just one hitout and he would've made Witts seem imposing given how limply he attacked a few contests. His previous appearance v Carlton was worse.
He played a lot like a bloke that had just one match in a five week period and skipped one of those to meet a politician. At 25 (26 by the time 2017 kicks off) I'd advise him to get a wriggle on and start making the most of every opportunity at this level. I'm not saying he's not going to make the grade more opening up discussion about the lack of progress from him over the past 8 weeks. Given he's foreign to the game continual improvement is crucial because no doubt everyone remembers Marty Clarke and what happened once the improvement slowed.
The one question I'll leave everyone to ponder is if he weren't really ridiculously super tall what would he have going for him as an AFL footballer? Following on from that what's the point of being that tall at AFL level if you go through games with 1 hitout and 1 mark?..
Odd that lots of people were saying that Aish was a spud, a bust and would never be any good earlier this season then, if everything he does is AFL quality
Premature thread, was quite good early in the year.
"what does he have going for him" when his confidence is up he is a very good mark for someone of his size, plus his speed and agility are ELITE for a super tall player. Also a great kick for goal at close to medium range
He looked rusty and he should be, but he still kicked goals and will be better next week
Its releveant in the sense we have two other experienced forwards with basically less output than Cox. Cox will improve, he has already. He looks eager to learn the game and improve his weaknesses.
What did you expect out of him at the start of the year to be massively concerned with his improvement so far at this stage? Did you expect 40 goals ? 20 hit outs a match ? If we are to be a top four team , we need to cull the areas which aren't improving , Cox isn't one of those, Cloke and White should be in the firing line. This is all relevant as they are playing similar positions.
Next project player we get from America needs to be 16-18 and learn the game earlier. 25 is too late.
Needs to play out the season in the VFL. We cant afford passengers
Actually his ruck work hasn't been as good as early on - again just goes to show what we are missing in our footy department.They aren't giving us less output lol.
My expectation was that he would either provide a marking presence I50 (which the other two have) or that he could compete through the ruck.
Given he isn't improving in either of those areas it's a conundrum. I wouldn't be cutting him as you touched on, but we need to see more.
They aren't giving us less output lol.
My expectation was that he would either provide a marking presence I50 (which the other two have) or that he could compete through the ruck.
Given he isn't improving in either of those areas it's a conundrum. I wouldn't be cutting him as you touched on, but we need to see more.
