CheapCharlie
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 12, 2015
- 6,416
- 7,985
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Their politics dont concern me.. i dont agree with them but thats no reason to ban them.
Specifically what hate speech did those people say that they should be banned?
The Law Freedom of Speech
- Thread starter ShanDog
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Specifically what hate speech did those people say that they should be banned?
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,520
- 52,801
- AFL Club
- GWS
You've missed the point.
Posters have claimed youtube is biased against conservative SJWs. I've pointed out that if that were the case, these accounts would be banned also.
CheapCharlie
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 12, 2015
- 6,416
- 7,985
- AFL Club
- Sydney
You asked me and i answered. Im not responsible for the thoughts of others
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,520
- 52,801
- AFL Club
- GWS
You claimed the right is being censored by social media.
If anyone can explain why so many prominent right wingers aren't banned, can you explain why.
CheapCharlie
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 12, 2015
- 6,416
- 7,985
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Dont be deliberately disingenuously thick.
It depends what they say not what politics they identify with
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,520
- 52,801
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Jul 30, 2018
- 11,782
- 15,176
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Banned
- #932
You ask these questions as if they are necessary for you. Not until absolute censorship will you be satisfied that your desired regime of censorship is sufficient.
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,520
- 52,801
- AFL Club
- GWS
Isn't censorship required to condemn something as censorship?
We keep hearing about censorship from these accounts with millions of subscribers. It's branding. Like the tape over the mouth cover shot.
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,520
- 52,801
- AFL Club
- GWS
And just on this, it seems the bannings are more reflective of more confrontational personalities. The Neil Erkisons and Alex Jones' will get their s**t banned because they target individuals.
Stefan Molyneux peddles biological racial hierarchies, but presents it in a calm, conversational manner, so he's fine.
Stefan Molyneux peddles biological racial hierarchies, but presents it in a calm, conversational manner, so he's fine.
- Jul 30, 2018
- 11,782
- 15,176
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Banned
- #935
Didn’t Roger Scruton just get sacked because of doctored quotes aimed at making him look bad?
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,520
- 52,801
- AFL Club
- GWS
No idea tbh.
Yep, some peanut at the Staggers, who then put a tweet out swigging champagne, gloating.
IIRC it was an unpaid advisory role. Fair point you make though.
CheapCharlie
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 12, 2015
- 6,416
- 7,985
- AFL Club
- Sydney
CheapCharlie
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 12, 2015
- 6,416
- 7,985
- AFL Club
- Sydney
quotemokc
Brownlow Medallist
Dixie Normous
Premiership Player
- Banned
- #945
He's got 2020 in the bag. Not even a contest. It's Nixon over McGovern to a tee
Nazi Germany started with censorship, the left are the new Nazi regime and don't even realise hilarious stuff
Oh dear, what people are forgetting is that speech can't actually be suppressed. Consequence can be applied to any speech or words or whatever you wanna call it.
The real issue is what is valid for consequence? Well again that's going to vary from one to the next isn't it? Regardless what anyone says or does someone somewhere is going to take offence - I've stated this many times and it cannot be disputed.
The blunt reality is we can't just censor everyone because someone somewhere doesn't like it.That is the epitome of impractical - it would literally mean taking away communication altogether if we're going to protect "everyone"
How people don't get that (including some posters on here) is the very reason it is in fact impossible to protect everyone from "speech". FMD we're literally debating on whether or not free speech should be allowed. It's f***** words ffs, how about the world stop being so immature and precious?
I'm sure someone somewhere is offended by this post, if so grow up you precious snowflake ffs.
The real issue is what is valid for consequence? Well again that's going to vary from one to the next isn't it? Regardless what anyone says or does someone somewhere is going to take offence - I've stated this many times and it cannot be disputed.
The blunt reality is we can't just censor everyone because someone somewhere doesn't like it.That is the epitome of impractical - it would literally mean taking away communication altogether if we're going to protect "everyone"
How people don't get that (including some posters on here) is the very reason it is in fact impossible to protect everyone from "speech". FMD we're literally debating on whether or not free speech should be allowed. It's f***** words ffs, how about the world stop being so immature and precious?
I'm sure someone somewhere is offended by this post, if so grow up you precious snowflake ffs.
