List Mgmt. Fremantle FC Contract List/Depth Chart

[serial_thrilla]

Tucker has signed on for two more years.

That just leaves North and Meek, and of course the BHill/Langdon scenario.

 

[more_of_bito]

Tucker has signed on for two more years.

That just leaves North and Meek, and of course the BHill/Langdon scenario.

Think Meek is signed ?

 

[summerthebat]

Contracts expiring at the end of 2020, from Footywire.

I think this is up to date?

Name Years Service Status Bailey Banfield​ 3​ Non-Free Agent​ Brandon Matera​ 3​ Non-Free Agent​ Brennan Cox​ 4​ Non-Free Agent​ Brett Bewley​ 2​ Non-Free Agent​ David Mundy​ 17​ Unrestricted Free Agent​ Hugh Dixon​ 3​ Non-Free Agent​ Jason Carter​ 2​ Non-Free Agent​ Lachlan Schultz​ 2​ Non-Free Agent​ Luke Ryan​ 4​ Non-Free Agent​ Luke Valente​ 2​ Non-Free Agent​ Biggest priorities/concerns will be Luke Ryan & Brennan Cox, but aside from those two it looks a fairly stress free contract year. I can't imagine Banfield, Dixon, Carter or Valente will provide much resistance in negotiations. Bewely & Schultz will need to show a bit more IMO, but we're still in a good position to negotiate with them if needed. Brandon Matera is a tricky one, he's 28 next year and we wouldn't want to be offering a contract for him deep into his 30's, but he'd be pushing for a three year deal at the very least. Cox might prove problematic because he probably feels he needs more opportunity (rightly or wrongly) so there may be a few clubs that are willing to sell him on the idea of a specific role and game time. Luke Ryan is a player every club would be inquiring into and they'd be offering him good money as well.

 

[mightymouse75]

Ryan will be the risky 1.

 

[serial_thrilla]

AFL.com.au is reporting that Meek has signed on for two more years.

Trade Wrap: Banned Pie sparks interest from handful of clubs

Sam Murray could find himself at a third AFL club, while a Lions midfielder is poised to return home to Victoria

m.afl.com.au

 

[freo_leo29]

Emerging ruck extends

Fremantle have shored up their ruck stocks by extending Lloyd Meek for a further two seasons

www.fremantlefc.com.au

Meek 2 years confirmed

 

[Taylor]

I'm only updating the master sheet during the off season, the age, weight, state of origin etc aren't going to be updated until the list is finalised.

 

[serial_thrilla]

Fremantle list update

The Fremantle Dockers confirmed a further two changes to the club’s playing list on Wednesday

m.fremantlefc.com.au

North and Dixon to be redrafted as rookies.

 

[wayToGo_]

Ryan extends for 3 years!!!! Whoop!

 

[Lach72]

Interested in how our list at the end of next year will be looking.

mundy to go probably.
guys like Crowden, Giro, Schultz, Bewley, Duman and Hughes will be very nervous I’d say

 

[Bender571]

Interested in how our list at the end of next year will be looking.

mundy to go probably.
guys like Crowden, Giro, Schultz, Bewley, Duman and Hughes will be very nervous I’d say

Crowden, Giro, Duman, and Hughes are signed up for 2021. If we're cutting contracts short Colyer should be one of the first to go. Banfield and McCarthy should be in the nervous group as well

 

[summerthebat]

Players out of contract at the end of 2020

Name Years Service Status Bailey Banfield​ 3​ Non-Free Agent​ Brandon Matera​ 3​ Non-Free Agent​ Brennan Cox​ 4​ Non-Free Agent​ Brett Bewley​ 2​ Non-Free Agent​ Cameron McCarthy​ 4​ Non-Free Agent​ David Mundy​ 17​ Unrestricted Free Agent​ Dillon O'Reilly​ 2​ Non-Free Agent​ Hugh Dixon​ 3​ Unrestricted Free Agent​ Jarvis Pina​ 1​ Non-Free Agent​ Jason Carter​ 2​ Non-Free Agent​ Lachlan Schultz​ 2​ Non-Free Agent​ Luke Valente​ 2​ Non-Free Agent​ Thomas North​ 1​ Unrestricted Free Agent​ Tobe Watson​ 2​ Non-Free Agent​

 

[Taylor]

Except Hugh Dixon and Tom North are both unrestricted free agents.

 

[Deathly]

Needs to be updated mate

 

[Taylor]

I do need to roll the mastersheet back and set it up.

 

[Taylor]

Done

 

[eastfreo75]

Their is talk that list sizes will be reduced to 35 with no rookie lists next year and 30 in 2022.

With so many young players are we in better position going forward because teams will have a handful of development players.

If we go with 3 draft picks, we will need to cut 15 players.

We may want to cut further as their will a lot of delisted free agents to choose from.

The other option is trade players out if they have any value.

Let’s say we cut the 9 Rookie Listed players, that leaves us to cut or trade out 6 players from the main list.

 

[Wizard]

Their is talk that list sizes will be reduced to 35 with no rookie lists next year and 30 in 2022.

With so many young players are we in better position going forward because teams will have a handful of development players.

If we go with 3 draft picks, we will need to cut 14 players.

We may want to cut further as they will a lot of delisted free agents to choose from.

Where is this talk coming from mate?

FWIW i think its an atrocious idea for the league, reducing list sizes for a 22 week + finals season is going to be really difficult for clubs to manage.

It would need to be done with some "injury dispensation" which allows clubs to top up 2-3 times a season to allow for injuries.
We routinely have over 8 on our injury list so list of 30 seems untenable.

 

[eastfreo75]

Where is this talk coming from mate?

FWIW i think its an atrocious idea for the league, reducing list sizes for a 22 week + finals season is going to be really difficult for clubs to manage.

It would need to be done with some "injury dispensation" which allows clubs to top up 2-3 times a season to allow for injuries.
We routinely have over 8 on our injury list so list of 30 seems untenable.

Analysis - 35 Player Senior Lists

There have been rumours for a week now that the AFL are considering reducing list sizes to 35 players. No rookie list. This was confirmed by Jimmy Bartel on The Age Real Footy podcast today. I’ve no idea how clubs are to manage this, as this has not been discussed or reported on as yet...

www.bigfooty.com

 

[eastfreo75]

Where is this talk coming from mate?

FWIW i think its an atrocious idea for the league, reducing list sizes for a 22 week + finals season is going to be really difficult for clubs to manage.

It would need to be done with some "injury dispensation" which allows clubs to top up 2-3 times a season to allow for injuries.
We routinely have over 8 on our injury list so list of 30 seems untenable.

West Coast’s original list was 35 and at one point they had 17 fit players.

I agree that 35 is too small and 30 is a nightmare.

Getting rid of the rookie list in the short term seems like a good cost cutting experience without sacrificing too much.

 

[dominguez]

Their is talk that list sizes will be reduced to 35 with no rookie lists next year and 30 in 2022.

With so many young players are we in better position going forward because teams will have a handful of development players.

If we go with 3 draft picks, we will need to cut 15 players.

We may want to cut further as their will a lot of delisted free agents to choose from.

The other option is trade players out if they have any value.

Let’s say we cut the 9 Rookie Listed players, that leaves us to cut or trade out 6 players from the main list.

They can't go to the 30 players, what if you get 9 injuries?

 

[dominguez]

West Coast’s original list was 35 and at one point they had 17 fit players.

So 3 guys played with minor injuries that week?

 

[eastfreo75]

So 3 guys played with minor injuries that week?

They rotated 3 players in the forward pockets and bench. The three players went match fit.

 

[eastfreo75]

They can't go to the 30 players, what if you get 9 injuries?

The clubs are total against that idea for the reason you have stated.

My gut feeling it will 38 and reduced to 35.

 

[Dockeroo]

Didn’t Gill say pretty Clearly Yesterday there will be no list size cuts in 2020?